<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>dak4.com - .net</title>
    <link>http://dak4.com/</link>
    <description>David Kearns Central</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>David Kearns</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:18:55 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.3.9074.18820</generator>
    <managingEditor>webmaster@dak4.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@dak4.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=1cbbda87-0028-4196-9c2f-fcb12a3038b1</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,1cbbda87-0028-4196-9c2f-fcb12a3038b1.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,1cbbda87-0028-4196-9c2f-fcb12a3038b1.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=1cbbda87-0028-4196-9c2f-fcb12a3038b1</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms131048.aspx">Enabling
CLR Integration</a>:<blockquote><span id="ctl00_MTContentSelector1_mainContentContainer_ctl01"><pre class="libCScode" style="white-space: pre-wrap;" id="ctl00_MTContentSelector1_mainContentContainer_ctl01" space="preserve">sp_configure 'show advanced options', 1;<br />
GO<br />
RECONFIGURE;<br />
GO<br />
sp_configure 'clr enabled', 1;<br />
GO<br />
RECONFIGURE;<br />
GO</pre></span></blockquote>Very exciting T-SQL script used today...</body>
      <title>CLR in SQL, exciting!</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,1cbbda87-0028-4196-9c2f-fcb12a3038b1.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2009/09/21/CLRInSQLExciting.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:18:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms131048.aspx"&gt;Enabling CLR Integration&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;span id="ctl00_MTContentSelector1_mainContentContainer_ctl01"&gt;&lt;pre class="libCScode" style="white-space: pre-wrap;" id="ctl00_MTContentSelector1_mainContentContainer_ctl01" space="preserve"&gt;sp_configure 'show advanced options', 1;&lt;br /&gt;
GO&lt;br /&gt;
RECONFIGURE;&lt;br /&gt;
GO&lt;br /&gt;
sp_configure 'clr enabled', 1;&lt;br /&gt;
GO&lt;br /&gt;
RECONFIGURE;&lt;br /&gt;
GO&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Very exciting T-SQL script used today...</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,1cbbda87-0028-4196-9c2f-fcb12a3038b1.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=343b6934-aea8-48e1-94b1-7104392c802a</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,343b6934-aea8-48e1-94b1-7104392c802a.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,343b6934-aea8-48e1-94b1-7104392c802a.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=343b6934-aea8-48e1-94b1-7104392c802a</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <a href="http://linqtoxsd.codeplex.com/">LINQ
to XSD - Home</a>:<blockquote>The LINQ to XSD technology provides .NET developers
with support for typed XML programming. LINQ to XSD contributes to the LINQ project
(.NET Language Integrated Query); in particular, LINQ to XSD enhances the existing
LINQ to XML technology.<br /></blockquote>Still not native, even in .NET 4.0, but no longer seems to be in alpha.</body>
      <title>LINQ to XSD</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,343b6934-aea8-48e1-94b1-7104392c802a.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2009/09/10/LINQToXSD.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:18:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://linqtoxsd.codeplex.com/"&gt;LINQ to XSD - Home&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;The LINQ
to XSD technology provides .NET developers with support for typed XML programming.
LINQ to XSD contributes to the LINQ project (.NET Language Integrated Query); in particular,
LINQ to XSD enhances the existing LINQ to XML technology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;Still not native, even in .NET 4.0, but no longer seems to be in alpha.</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,343b6934-aea8-48e1-94b1-7104392c802a.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=5e8119fb-e6ef-4a9d-b18d-7c2bbac0ccca</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,5e8119fb-e6ef-4a9d-b18d-7c2bbac0ccca.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,5e8119fb-e6ef-4a9d-b18d-7c2bbac0ccca.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=5e8119fb-e6ef-4a9d-b18d-7c2bbac0ccca</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Yes, I am redoing my work site. ColdFusion
5 to ASP.NET 3.5, so there is lots of potential for improvement. One such improvement
is localization. The last time I tried localization I was on ASP.NET 1.1 I think,
and it seems some improvement was made in ASP.NET 2.0/VisualStudio 2005 (and it all
still works with 3.5/2008).<br /><br /><a href="http://www.codeproject.com/Kb/aspnet/localizationByVivekTakur.aspx">CodeProject:
Globalization and localization demystified in ASP.NET 2.0. Free source code and programming
help</a>:<blockquote>Globalization and localization are two important processes which
every developer should be aware of while creating global products or applications.
Though there are many articles which explain the subject well, I did not find a single
resource which explains all important concepts regarding globalization/localization,
practically and comprehensively. This article aims to provide practical step-by-step
approach to globalizing a web application in ASP.NET 2.0.<br /></blockquote>Relatively painless so far, though I am taking shortcuts by only using
language and not culture, so I'm not going to be changing symbols or currency markings,
etc. Plus I'm not tackling support for RTL languages, I'll worry about that later...</body>
      <title>Localization in ASP.NET 3.5</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,5e8119fb-e6ef-4a9d-b18d-7c2bbac0ccca.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2008/12/17/LocalizationInASPNET35.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:55:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Yes, I am redoing my work site. ColdFusion 5 to ASP.NET 3.5, so there is lots of potential for improvement. One such improvement is localization. The last time I tried localization I was on ASP.NET 1.1 I think, and it seems some improvement was made in ASP.NET 2.0/VisualStudio 2005 (and it all still works with 3.5/2008).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.codeproject.com/Kb/aspnet/localizationByVivekTakur.aspx"&gt;CodeProject:
Globalization and localization demystified in ASP.NET 2.0. Free source code and programming
help&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;Globalization and localization are two important processes which
every developer should be aware of while creating global products or applications.
Though there are many articles which explain the subject well, I did not find a single
resource which explains all important concepts regarding globalization/localization,
practically and comprehensively. This article aims to provide practical step-by-step
approach to globalizing a web application in ASP.NET 2.0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;Relatively painless so far, though I am taking shortcuts by only using language and not culture, so I'm not going to be changing symbols or currency markings, etc. Plus I'm not tackling support for RTL languages, I'll worry about that later...</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,5e8119fb-e6ef-4a9d-b18d-7c2bbac0ccca.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=bbddf022-b220-4769-a398-1eb6803b9eda</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,bbddf022-b220-4769-a398-1eb6803b9eda.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,bbddf022-b220-4769-a398-1eb6803b9eda.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=bbddf022-b220-4769-a398-1eb6803b9eda</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <a href="http://www.eggheadcafe.com/articles/20020906.asp">Forms
Authentication, Identities and Roles from a Database</a>:<blockquote>One of the most
useful and perhaps most misunderstood authentication schemes built in to the ASP.NET
runtime is Forms Authentication. Useful, because it is highly extensible and flexible
(as we'll see in a moment). Misunderstood, because most developers don't get past
the default setup described in the documentation and therefore never find out how
to extend and customize it.<br /></blockquote>I still don't understand why I have to roll my own Forms auth with Roles,
I would expect that everyone would want to use roles, but oh well...</body>
      <title>Thanks Peter A. Bromberg, Ph.D., Bawk Bawk</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,bbddf022-b220-4769-a398-1eb6803b9eda.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2008/11/24/ThanksPeterABrombergPhDBawkBawk.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:58:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.eggheadcafe.com/articles/20020906.asp"&gt;Forms Authentication, Identities
and Roles from a Database&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;One of the most useful and perhaps most
misunderstood authentication schemes built in to the ASP.NET runtime is Forms Authentication.
Useful, because it is highly extensible and flexible (as we'll see in a moment). Misunderstood,
because most developers don't get past the default setup described in the documentation
and therefore never find out how to extend and customize it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;I still don't understand why I have to roll my own Forms auth with Roles, I would expect that everyone would want to use roles, but oh well...</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,bbddf022-b220-4769-a398-1eb6803b9eda.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=e4900d76-fd8e-4a9c-a92a-ce24e870f8f9</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,e4900d76-fd8e-4a9c-a92a-ce24e870f8f9.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,e4900d76-fd8e-4a9c-a92a-ce24e870f8f9.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=e4900d76-fd8e-4a9c-a92a-ce24e870f8f9</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <a href="http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/mcgtmpl.asp?url=/content/dpwt/operations/highway/vacuum.asp">DPWT
- Highway Maintenance: Leaf Vacuuming</a>:<blockquote>The Leaf Collection Program
will be conducted for approximately 6 to 8 weeks, and includes postings for 2 scheduled
pick-ups. We will post green signs throughout the work areas several days before our
crews' arrival. We will attempt to allow a weekend for residents to rake their leaves
to the edge of the road for vacuum pick-up. Signs will be removed after our crews
complete each street. The second and final fall collection will begin after Thanksgiving.
The timing will depend on weather conditions. Red signs will indicate that this is
the final collection. The same procedure of posting, collection, and sign removal
is used for the final vacuum collection.<br /></blockquote>I saw people collecting leaves, I never saw any green signs...</body>
      <title>Where are the signs?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,e4900d76-fd8e-4a9c-a92a-ce24e870f8f9.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2008/11/19/WhereAreTheSigns.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:14:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/mcgtmpl.asp?url=/content/dpwt/operations/highway/vacuum.asp"&gt;DPWT
- Highway Maintenance: Leaf Vacuuming&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;The Leaf Collection Program
will be conducted for approximately 6 to 8 weeks, and includes postings for 2 scheduled
pick-ups. We will post green signs throughout the work areas several days before our
crews' arrival. We will attempt to allow a weekend for residents to rake their leaves
to the edge of the road for vacuum pick-up. Signs will be removed after our crews
complete each street. The second and final fall collection will begin after Thanksgiving.
The timing will depend on weather conditions. Red signs will indicate that this is
the final collection. The same procedure of posting, collection, and sign removal
is used for the final vacuum collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;I saw people collecting leaves, I never saw any green signs...</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,e4900d76-fd8e-4a9c-a92a-ce24e870f8f9.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=eef9f5fd-8045-41a8-a810-52078efa0d33</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,eef9f5fd-8045-41a8-a810-52078efa0d33.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,eef9f5fd-8045-41a8-a810-52078efa0d33.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=eef9f5fd-8045-41a8-a810-52078efa0d33</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <a href="http://www.cancelcable.com/why-keeping-cable-tv-is-like-buying-a-new-plasma-tv-each-year-and-tossing-it-in-the-dumpster/14/">Like
buying a new 50″ TV each year and tossing it in the dumpster. — CancelCable.com</a>:<blockquote><strong>What
if you could eliminate your gas bill and still drive 95% of the places you currently
go? </strong>Or stop paying for heating by keeping your thermostat two degrees cooler?
These aren’t possible, but you can stop paying for TV and still watch most of your
favorite shows. 
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong> Budgets are tight.</strong><strong></strong> But most people are still reluctant
to give up cable. Even when it may be financially crazy to keep it. <strong>Paying
$95/month for cable? That’s over $1100 a year.</strong> Or enough to buy a <a href="http://www.samsclub.com/shopping/navigate.do?dest=5&amp;item=377230&amp;pCatg=5884" target="_blank">50″
HD Plasma TV</a> each year.
</p><p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Save the money or put it towards that new big screen TV.</strong> Then use
free <a href="http://www.cancelcable.com/what-is-free-digital-broadcast-tv/11/">digital
broadcast TV</a> and avoid paying monthly cable tv fees. Save the money and earn interest
on it. With a 6% rate of return…
</p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>
After 3 years you will have saved $3747</li><li>
After 5 years you will have saved $6648</li><li>
After 10 years you will have saved $15,621</li><li>
After 20 years you will have saved $44,083</li></ul><p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Congratulations! You have now turned a major expense into an investment.</strong></p><p style="text-align: left;"><strong>What are you missing? Not much. </strong>We did it and still watch all our
favorite shows. Most were broadcast (Lost, 24, etc.) . Using a $16 digital antenna
our picture quality is actually better than our old digital cable. Most of our favorite
cable shows (Daily Show, Colbert Report) are available for <a href="http://www.cancelcable.com/watch-your-favorite-cable-shows-using-hulucom-netflix-and-itunes/16/">free
on the Internet</a>. Our kids watch videos on Disney.com and Nick.com and we get current
movies and HBO shows with a Netflix subscription.
</p></blockquote><p style="text-align: left;">
Props: <a href="http://www.cancelcable.com">CancelCable.com</a> via <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/15/AR2008111500190.html?referrer=emailarticle">Washington
Post</a> via <a href="http://idledreams.net/">Lord Scarlet</a><br /></p></body>
      <title>Cancel Cable dot commmmm</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,eef9f5fd-8045-41a8-a810-52078efa0d33.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2008/11/18/CancelCableDotCommmmm.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:30:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.cancelcable.com/why-keeping-cable-tv-is-like-buying-a-new-plasma-tv-each-year-and-tossing-it-in-the-dumpster/14/"&gt;Like
buying a new 50″ TV each year and tossing it in the dumpster. — CancelCable.com&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What
if you could eliminate your gas bill and still drive 95% of the places you currently
go? &lt;/strong&gt;Or stop paying for heating by keeping your thermostat two degrees cooler?
These aren’t possible, but you can stop paying for TV and still watch most of your
favorite shows. 
&lt;p style="text-align: left;"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; Budgets are tight.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt; But most people are still reluctant
to give up cable. Even when it may be financially crazy to keep it. &lt;strong&gt;Paying
$95/month for cable? That’s over $1100 a year.&lt;/strong&gt; Or enough to buy a &lt;a href="http://www.samsclub.com/shopping/navigate.do?dest=5&amp;amp;item=377230&amp;amp;pCatg=5884" target="_blank"&gt;50″
HD Plasma TV&lt;/a&gt; each year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: left;"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Save the money or put it towards that new big screen TV.&lt;/strong&gt; Then use
free &lt;a href="http://www.cancelcable.com/what-is-free-digital-broadcast-tv/11/"&gt;digital
broadcast TV&lt;/a&gt; and avoid paying monthly cable tv fees. Save the money and earn interest
on it. With a 6% rate of return…
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul style="text-align: left;"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
After 3 years you will have saved $3747&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
After 5 years you will have saved $6648&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
After 10 years you will have saved $15,621&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
After 20 years you will have saved $44,083&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: left;"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Congratulations! You have now turned a major expense into an investment.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: left;"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;What are you missing? Not much. &lt;/strong&gt;We did it and still watch all our
favorite shows. Most were broadcast (Lost, 24, etc.) . Using a $16 digital antenna
our picture quality is actually better than our old digital cable. Most of our favorite
cable shows (Daily Show, Colbert Report) are available for &lt;a href="http://www.cancelcable.com/watch-your-favorite-cable-shows-using-hulucom-netflix-and-itunes/16/"&gt;free
on the Internet&lt;/a&gt;. Our kids watch videos on Disney.com and Nick.com and we get current
movies and HBO shows with a Netflix subscription.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: left;"&gt;
Props: &lt;a href="http://www.cancelcable.com"&gt;CancelCable.com&lt;/a&gt; via &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/15/AR2008111500190.html?referrer=emailarticle"&gt;Washington
Post&lt;/a&gt; via &lt;a href="http://idledreams.net/"&gt;Lord Scarlet&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,eef9f5fd-8045-41a8-a810-52078efa0d33.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=73d3de20-7db2-42e9-87a2-41efaa2e5042</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,73d3de20-7db2-42e9-87a2-41efaa2e5042.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,73d3de20-7db2-42e9-87a2-41efaa2e5042.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=73d3de20-7db2-42e9-87a2-41efaa2e5042</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <a href="http://www.umbraco.org/">Umbraco
- The Friendly CMS</a>:<blockquote>Who would believe that there would be an <strong>open
source CMS based on Microsoft's ASP.NET</strong>? A CMS that can support any modern
browser and that even <strong>allows editing with Microsoft Word</strong>. One where
designers can <strong>create accessible and valid xhtml</strong> with their markup
left intact. Where developers can <strong>integrate any .net based control</strong> right
out of the box. If someone tells you "wont' happen", then they have never used umbraco..<br /></blockquote>Well I haven't done 1/2 of that yet, but I'm only a day in and already
seeing progress on implementing a design given to me without knowing the platform
ahead of time, and I can say I like what I see so far. I'm going to have to learn
a few new skills (XSLT, XPath, etc.) but this is CMS done right, and you can't beat
the price.<br /><br />
Props to <a href="http://www.firepigpartners.com/">Fire Pig Partners</a>.</body>
      <title>Umbraco in the house</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,73d3de20-7db2-42e9-87a2-41efaa2e5042.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2008/08/26/UmbracoInTheHouse.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:25:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.umbraco.org/"&gt;Umbraco - The Friendly CMS&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;Who would
believe that there would be an &lt;strong&gt;open source CMS based on Microsoft's ASP.NET&lt;/strong&gt;?
A CMS that can support any modern browser and that even &lt;strong&gt;allows editing with
Microsoft Word&lt;/strong&gt;. One where designers can &lt;strong&gt;create accessible and valid
xhtml&lt;/strong&gt; with their markup left intact. Where developers can &lt;strong&gt;integrate
any .net based control&lt;/strong&gt; right out of the box. If someone tells you "wont'
happen", then they have never used umbraco..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;Well I haven't done 1/2 of that yet, but I'm only a day in and already
seeing progress on implementing a design given to me without knowing the platform
ahead of time, and I can say I like what I see so far. I'm going to have to learn
a few new skills (XSLT, XPath, etc.) but this is CMS done right, and you can't beat
the price.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Props to &lt;a href="http://www.firepigpartners.com/"&gt;Fire Pig Partners&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,73d3de20-7db2-42e9-87a2-41efaa2e5042.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=5dd1829c-ee0a-447c-962b-ff780d5f5828</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,5dd1829c-ee0a-447c-962b-ff780d5f5828.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,5dd1829c-ee0a-447c-962b-ff780d5f5828.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=5dd1829c-ee0a-447c-962b-ff780d5f5828</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>Applications are coming soon
to iPhone and iPod touch.* And they’ll be unlike anything you’ve ever seen on a mobile
device. That’s because the world’s best developers are creating applications to leverage
the amazing technology in iPhone and iPod touch, such as the Multi-Touch interface,
the accelerometer, GPS, real-time 3D graphics, and 3D positional audio. It’s all part
of the iPhone 2.0 Software Update — coming soon.<br /></blockquote>
        <div align="right">[ <a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/store/appstore.html">Apple
- iTunes - iTunes Store - App Store</a> ]
</div>
        <p>
I really love my new iPod touch. I hope this upgrade won't be more than $20, or I
should have just waited to get my iPod. I just got all excited at the announcement...<br /></p>
      </body>
      <title>Jumped the gun</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,5dd1829c-ee0a-447c-962b-ff780d5f5828.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2008/06/29/JumpedTheGun.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 02:31:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Applications are coming soon to iPhone and iPod touch.* And they’ll be
unlike anything you’ve ever seen on a mobile device. That’s because the world’s best
developers are creating applications to leverage the amazing technology in iPhone
and iPod touch, such as the Multi-Touch interface, the accelerometer, GPS, real-time
3D graphics, and 3D positional audio. It’s all part of the iPhone 2.0 Software Update
— coming soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;[ &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/store/appstore.html"&gt;Apple
- iTunes - iTunes Store - App Store&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I really love my new iPod touch. I hope this upgrade won't be more than $20, or I
should have just waited to get my iPod. I just got all excited at the announcement...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,5dd1829c-ee0a-447c-962b-ff780d5f5828.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=079cff9e-726f-4728-855a-a570fd7cac04</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,079cff9e-726f-4728-855a-a570fd7cac04.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,079cff9e-726f-4728-855a-a570fd7cac04.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=079cff9e-726f-4728-855a-a570fd7cac04</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I believe that my wife's cultural lens and mine see "Karma" in extremely different
lights, which makes me question: What do people think "Karma" means?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.answers.com/What%20is%20karma%3F">karma: Definition and Much More
from Answers.com</a> (excerpt):
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <ol>
            <li>
The explanation of karma can differ per tradition. Usually it is believed to be a
sum of all that an individual has done, is currently doing and will do. The results
or "fruits" of actions are called karma-phala. Karma is not about retribution, vengeance,
punishment or reward; karma simply deals with what is. The effects of all deeds actively
create past, present and future experiences, thus making one responsible for one's
own life, and the pain and joy it brings to others. In religions that incorporate
reincarnation, karma extends through one's present life and all past and future lives
as well. It is cumulative.</li>
            <li>
karma is referred to as karmic dirt, as it consists of very subtle and microscopic
particles i.e. pudgala that pervade the entire universe. Karmas are attracted to the
karmic field of a soul on account of vibrations created by activities of mind, speech
and body as well as on account of various mental dispositions. Hence the karmas are
the subtle matter surrounding the consciousness of a soul. When these two components
i.e. consciousness and karma interact, we experience the life as we know it at present.</li>
            <li>
The idea of karma was popularized in the Western world through the work of the Theosophical
Society. Kardecist and Western New Age reinterpretations of karma frequently cast
it as a sort of luck associated with virtue: if one does good or spiritually valuable
acts, one deserves and can expect good luck; conversely, if one does harmful things,
one can expect bad luck or unfortunate happenings. In this conception, karma is affiliated
with the Neopagan law of return or Threefold Law, the idea that the beneficial or
harmful effects one has on the world will return to oneself. Colloquially this may
be summed up as 'what goes around comes around.'</li>
          </ol>
        </blockquote>
        <p>
Which is your take? Or do you have all together different one?
</p>
        <p>
Please think about your answer before reading mine...
</p>
        <p>
I think I'm very much in the #3 camp. I think Karma has entered the Western group
conciousness as a quick explanation of "what goes around comes around" without placing
any emphasis on the force behind that concept: IE: God, Nature, Majik, etc. And that
the entire concept of reincarnation is absent in the Western (though possibly just
American) basic understanding.
</p>
        <p>
          <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee_Talk">Discuss</a>.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>What is Karma?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,079cff9e-726f-4728-855a-a570fd7cac04.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2008/06/27/WhatIsKarma.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:26:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
I believe that my wife's cultural lens and mine see "Karma" in extremely different
lights, which makes me question: What do people think "Karma" means?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.answers.com/What%20is%20karma%3F"&gt;karma: Definition and Much More
from Answers.com&lt;/a&gt; (excerpt):
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
The explanation of karma can differ per tradition. Usually it is believed to be a
sum of all that an individual has done, is currently doing and will do. The results
or "fruits" of actions are called karma-phala. Karma is not about retribution, vengeance,
punishment or reward; karma simply deals with what is. The effects of all deeds actively
create past, present and future experiences, thus making one responsible for one's
own life, and the pain and joy it brings to others. In religions that incorporate
reincarnation, karma extends through one's present life and all past and future lives
as well. It is cumulative.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
karma is referred to as karmic dirt, as it consists of very subtle and microscopic
particles i.e. pudgala that pervade the entire universe. Karmas are attracted to the
karmic field of a soul on account of vibrations created by activities of mind, speech
and body as well as on account of various mental dispositions. Hence the karmas are
the subtle matter surrounding the consciousness of a soul. When these two components
i.e. consciousness and karma interact, we experience the life as we know it at present.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
The idea of karma was popularized in the Western world through the work of the Theosophical
Society. Kardecist and Western New Age reinterpretations of karma frequently cast
it as a sort of luck associated with virtue: if one does good or spiritually valuable
acts, one deserves and can expect good luck; conversely, if one does harmful things,
one can expect bad luck or unfortunate happenings. In this conception, karma is affiliated
with the Neopagan law of return or Threefold Law, the idea that the beneficial or
harmful effects one has on the world will return to oneself. Colloquially this may
be summed up as 'what goes around comes around.'&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Which is your take? Or do you have all together different one?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Please think about your answer before reading mine...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I think I'm very much in the #3 camp. I think Karma has entered the Western group
conciousness as a quick explanation of "what goes around comes around" without placing
any emphasis on the force behind that concept: IE: God, Nature, Majik, etc. And that
the entire concept of reincarnation is absent in the Western (though possibly just
American) basic understanding.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee_Talk"&gt;Discuss&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,079cff9e-726f-4728-855a-a570fd7cac04.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
      <category>english</category>
      <category>survey</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=86226b39-9038-4dae-85b5-2a4a88a3241d</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,86226b39-9038-4dae-85b5-2a4a88a3241d.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,86226b39-9038-4dae-85b5-2a4a88a3241d.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=86226b39-9038-4dae-85b5-2a4a88a3241d</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <blockquote>Publishing and testing a Windows Communication Foundation Service in IIS7
on Windows Vista is pretty straightforward, but there are a few pitfalls to look out
for along the way. This post is designed to compliment the screencast ‘Creating and
consuming your first WCF Service’ which I will publish here soon. I hope sharing this
with you saves you some time when deploying your first service.</blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://yourbit.com/2008/03/09/hosting-a-windows-communication-foundation-service-in-iis7-on-windows-vista/">Hosting
a WCF Service using IIS7 and Windows Vista Nick Kewney’s Blog</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
Since my last .Net web service was pre-WSE and this is at least 3 iterations later,
I have a bit to catch up on. They've certainly complicated things via abstraction,
which is probably a great help to many, but seems like overkill for my purposes, but
this post helped a lot. Since I need authentication WCF "wants" me to use transport
security, ie SSL, so people can't snoop on the credentials. Nice that the framework
is enforcing such standards, bad that I have to do that in my development environment.
Well, WCF doing a SOAP "basic" webservice via HTTPS is set up on my machine. Now I
have to figure out how to implement the authentication headers...
</p>
      </body>
      <title>WCF on IIS7 in Vista</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,86226b39-9038-4dae-85b5-2a4a88a3241d.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2008/05/06/WCFOnIIS7InVista.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:56:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Publishing and testing a Windows Communication Foundation Service in IIS7
on Windows Vista is pretty straightforward, but there are a few pitfalls to look out
for along the way. This post is designed to compliment the screencast ‘Creating and
consuming your first WCF Service’ which I will publish here soon. I hope sharing this
with you saves you some time when deploying your first service.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://yourbit.com/2008/03/09/hosting-a-windows-communication-foundation-service-in-iis7-on-windows-vista/"&gt;Hosting
a WCF Service using IIS7 and Windows Vista Nick Kewney’s Blog&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Since my last .Net web service was pre-WSE and this is at least 3 iterations later,
I have a bit to catch up on. They've certainly complicated things via abstraction,
which is probably a great help to many, but seems like overkill for my purposes, but
this post helped a lot. Since I need authentication WCF "wants" me to use transport
security, ie SSL, so people can't snoop on the credentials. Nice that the framework
is enforcing such standards, bad that I have to do that in my development environment.
Well, WCF doing a SOAP "basic" webservice via HTTPS is set up on my machine. Now I
have to figure out how to implement the authentication headers...
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,86226b39-9038-4dae-85b5-2a4a88a3241d.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=e399775d-9827-4c67-b6ff-4ee8856a1064</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,e399775d-9827-4c67-b6ff-4ee8856a1064.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,e399775d-9827-4c67-b6ff-4ee8856a1064.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=e399775d-9827-4c67-b6ff-4ee8856a1064</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
I'm primarily a web-based interface programmer, I haven't done non-web-based applications
for my main gig for a while, though in the before web age I did dial-up applications
(in ansi!). They, however, didn't need multi-threading for updating the GUI while
doing the work in a separate thread. This is one thing that has always daunted me
with Windows applications, perhaps VB and c++ programmers just like dealing with all
the threading issues for fun. Finally I found this:
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
The BackgroundWorker Component allows a form to run an operation asynchronously. This
is very useful when we deal with such kind of operations as database transactions,
image downloads etc. In this case our user interface can hang (or not appear until
loading will be finished). In this article I will show (step-by-step) how you can
use the BackgroundWorker Component in .NET 2 applications to execute time-consuming
operations. The examples are written using C#.
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/LivMic/BGWorker07032007000515AM/BGWorker.aspx">Using
the BackgroundWorker Component in .NET 2 applications</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
Perhaps I was supposed to know that was there all along, of course since much of what
I do in .net happens so quickly that multi-threading is useless, and the interface
is all sent via HTML, etc., I've just never run across having to do this right, until
today. Doing a DB import of 25K+ records from access into a local SQL server requires
more time than the GUI updating would like, and this was the easy-peasey-lemon-squeezey
way of doing that, let me tell you. Just drag this tool onto the playing field, and
then double-click a few auto-stubbed event handlers, plus toggle the property "WorkerSupportsProgress",
wire up what I want to get done with a call to notify the progress bar, wire in the
progress bar updater, and voilà! it's almost like I know what I'm doing...
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Proper Threading</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,e399775d-9827-4c67-b6ff-4ee8856a1064.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2008/04/03/ProperThreading.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:03:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I'm primarily a web-based interface programmer, I haven't done non-web-based applications
for my main gig for a while, though in the before web age I did dial-up applications
(in ansi!). They, however, didn't need multi-threading for updating the GUI while
doing the work in a separate thread. This is one thing that has always daunted me
with Windows applications, perhaps VB and c++ programmers just like dealing with all
the threading issues for fun. Finally I found this:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
The BackgroundWorker Component allows a form to run an operation asynchronously. This
is very useful when we deal with such kind of operations as database transactions,
image downloads etc. In this case our user interface can hang (or not appear until
loading will be finished). In this article I will show (step-by-step) how you can
use the BackgroundWorker Component in .NET 2 applications to execute time-consuming
operations. The examples are written using C#.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/LivMic/BGWorker07032007000515AM/BGWorker.aspx"&gt;Using
the BackgroundWorker Component in .NET 2 applications&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Perhaps I was supposed to know that was there all along, of course since much of what
I do in .net happens so quickly that multi-threading is useless, and the interface
is all sent via HTML, etc., I've just never run across having to do this right, until
today. Doing a DB import of 25K+ records from access into a local SQL server requires
more time than the GUI updating would like, and this was the easy-peasey-lemon-squeezey
way of doing that, let me tell you. Just drag this tool onto the playing field, and
then double-click a few auto-stubbed event handlers, plus toggle the property "WorkerSupportsProgress",
wire up what I want to get done with a call to notify the progress bar, wire in the
progress bar updater, and voilà! it's almost like I know what I'm doing...
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,e399775d-9827-4c67-b6ff-4ee8856a1064.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=2cc24acc-d3d7-494e-a747-43945225b612</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,2cc24acc-d3d7-494e-a747-43945225b612.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,2cc24acc-d3d7-494e-a747-43945225b612.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=2cc24acc-d3d7-494e-a747-43945225b612</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
So many people are hatin' on the Vista these days, I still like it. However, as with
anything, there are a few irritances. In my case I program in .NET on my computer,
and sometimes I send emails with my code. I could easily test this in XP using the
IIS SMTP server that was included with XP. For security reasons Microsoft decided
to not only not pre-install the SMTP server, but make it disappear. This means you
need an external SMTP server to test any code that uses email, or it throws errors.
Erg. So I went searching for a replacement (since Microsoft isn't bringing one) that
will allow me to get my test environment back, and today I found one:<br /></p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
            <strong>SmarterMail</strong> Free Edition is limited to <b>10 email users on a single
domain</b>, and includes all the functionality of <strong>SmarterMail Enterprise Edition</strong>.
</p>
          <p>
Unlike trial software or shareware, free SmarterTools products contain no time limits,
popup nag screens, or functionality limits (besides the user limit mentioned above). 
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.smartertools.com/Products/SmarterMail/Free.aspx">Free Edition
| SmarterMail 4.x | SmarterTools Inc.</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
After installing I had to find the settings and move the SMTP to 127.0.0.1:25 so I
didn't need to do odd settings on my programs, but since I no longer have any other
SMTP server, that should be fine.<br /></p>
      </body>
      <title>Thanks SmarterTools, bawk bawk</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,2cc24acc-d3d7-494e-a747-43945225b612.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2007/11/27/ThanksSmarterToolsBawkBawk.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:49:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
So many people are hatin' on the Vista these days, I still like it. However, as with
anything, there are a few irritances. In my case I program in .NET on my computer,
and sometimes I send emails with my code. I could easily test this in XP using the
IIS SMTP server that was included with XP. For security reasons Microsoft decided
to not only not pre-install the SMTP server, but make it disappear. This means you
need an external SMTP server to test any code that uses email, or it throws errors.
Erg. So I went searching for a replacement (since Microsoft isn't bringing one) that
will allow me to get my test environment back, and today I found one:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;SmarterMail&lt;/strong&gt; Free Edition is limited to &lt;b&gt;10 email users on a single
domain&lt;/b&gt;, and includes all the functionality of &lt;strong&gt;SmarterMail Enterprise Edition&lt;/strong&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Unlike trial software or shareware, free SmarterTools products contain no time limits,
popup nag screens, or functionality limits (besides the user limit mentioned above). 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align="right"&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.smartertools.com/Products/SmarterMail/Free.aspx"&gt;Free Edition
| SmarterMail 4.x | SmarterTools Inc.&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;
After installing I had to find the settings and move the SMTP to 127.0.0.1:25 so I
didn't need to do odd settings on my programs, but since I no longer have any other
SMTP server, that should be fine.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,2cc24acc-d3d7-494e-a747-43945225b612.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=972b9a17-ecb0-406b-bb8d-a7473d226b5c</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,972b9a17-ecb0-406b-bb8d-a7473d226b5c.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,972b9a17-ecb0-406b-bb8d-a7473d226b5c.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=972b9a17-ecb0-406b-bb8d-a7473d226b5c</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <p>
At Doceus, our Solutions Architects design and deliver solutions for small to midsize
businesses, associations, and non-profit organizations. Duties include writing technical
specifications and developing web based applications, and maintaining said applications,
over their life cycle, for our clients. 
</p>
          <p>
Our Solutions Architects are a key part of the Doceus professional services team and
are expected to provide an exceptional level of customer service, and assist in strengthening
our development and service delivery processes and practices. As a member of Doceus'
professional services team Solutions Architects are often required to liaise with
clients, so strong written, oral communications and analytical skills are essential.
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.doceus.com/About_Doceus/Careers/Solutions_Architect.ashx">doceus
:: accelerate success</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
And we're a telecommuting operation, so you must:
</p>
        <blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
          <p align="left">
... have access to a broadband connection, have a home telephone and the ability to
travel into Washignton DC or Rockville, MD for team meetings. Doceus will consider
candidates outside of the Washington DC region if the candidate has access to a major
metro airport.
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p dir="ltr" align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.doceus.com/about_doceus/Careers/applynow.aspx">Apply Online</a> ]
</p>
        <p dir="ltr" align="left">
So if you've been itching to work with me, now's the time...
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Doceus is hiring again...</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,972b9a17-ecb0-406b-bb8d-a7473d226b5c.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2006/10/27/DoceusIsHiringAgain.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:00:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
At Doceus, our Solutions Architects design and deliver solutions for small to midsize
businesses, associations, and non-profit organizations. Duties include writing technical
specifications and developing web based applications, and maintaining said applications,
over their life cycle, for our clients. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Our Solutions Architects are a key part of the Doceus professional services team and
are expected to provide an exceptional level of customer service, and assist in strengthening
our development and service delivery processes and practices. As a member of Doceus'
professional services team Solutions Architects are often required to liaise with
clients, so strong written, oral communications and analytical skills are essential.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.doceus.com/About_Doceus/Careers/Solutions_Architect.ashx"&gt;doceus
:: accelerate success&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
And we're a telecommuting operation, so you must:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt; 
&lt;p align=left&gt;
... have access to a broadband connection, have a home telephone and the ability to
travel into Washignton DC or Rockville, MD for team meetings. Doceus will consider
candidates outside of the Washington DC region if the candidate has access to a major
metro airport.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p dir=ltr align=right&gt;
[&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.doceus.com/about_doceus/Careers/applynow.aspx"&gt;Apply Online&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p dir=ltr align=left&gt;
So if you've been itching to work with me, now's the time...
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,972b9a17-ecb0-406b-bb8d-a7473d226b5c.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
      <category>work</category>
      <category>www</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=d9fc5e7f-7878-4769-afee-e5e1ab6f95e7</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,d9fc5e7f-7878-4769-afee-e5e1ab6f95e7.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,d9fc5e7f-7878-4769-afee-e5e1ab6f95e7.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=d9fc5e7f-7878-4769-afee-e5e1ab6f95e7</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
Delegates and Events can be a bit confusing, especially to Nate's favorite instructor.
Personally I do them so seldom that I find I need an example each time I write one.
This time I googled and found the following:
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
All of us have been exposed to event driven programming of some sort or the other.
C# adds on value to the often mentioned world of event driven programming by adding
support through events and delegates. The emphasis of this article would be to identify
what exactly happens when you add an event handler to your common UI controls.
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.akadia.com/services/dotnet_delegates_and_events.html">Delegates
and Events in C# / .NET</a> ]
</p>
      </body>
      <title>The best explanation of delegates I've seen so far...</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,d9fc5e7f-7878-4769-afee-e5e1ab6f95e7.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2006/10/01/TheBestExplanationOfDelegatesIveSeenSoFar.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 02:01:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Delegates and Events can be a bit confusing, especially to Nate's favorite instructor.
Personally I do them so seldom that I find I need an example each time I write one.
This time I googled and found the following:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
All of us have been exposed to event driven programming of some sort or the other.
C# adds on value to the often mentioned world of event driven programming by adding
support through events and delegates. The emphasis of this article would be to identify
what exactly happens when you add an event handler to your common UI controls.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.akadia.com/services/dotnet_delegates_and_events.html"&gt;Delegates
and Events in C# / .NET&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,d9fc5e7f-7878-4769-afee-e5e1ab6f95e7.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=cb7b64d6-a0b9-4d51-b491-819d1aed09dd</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,cb7b64d6-a0b9-4d51-b491-819d1aed09dd.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,cb7b64d6-a0b9-4d51-b491-819d1aed09dd.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=cb7b64d6-a0b9-4d51-b491-819d1aed09dd</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
Symptom: When saving a file in Visual Studio 2005, the entire IDE becomes non-responsive
(ie. freezes) for about 10-15 seconds. Meanwhile, the save icon in the status bar
is animated. After 15 seconds, the file is saved and the IDE is responsive again. 
</p>
          <p>
Solution: "With the help of a network packet analyzer I was able to find out what
stalls Visual Studio. I found that whenever I saved a file, in my web project, Visual
Studio did a DNS lookup on a host on my local network. This host was offline so although
it managed to resolve it's IP address, there was no response from it. After a timeout
period Visual Studio stops trying to connect to this host and goes on with it's business
of saving the file. 
</p>
          <p>
I searched my registry to find the source of this host name and found it to be present
in: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\8.0\ProjectMRUList. This registry
key is where Visual Studio stores all recent projects that have been opened. In that
list a project, located on a remote computer, was found. When I removed that item
from the registry, Visual Studio no longer took 20 seconds to save it's Web project
files." 
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://west-wind.com/weblog/posts/3918.aspx">Slow VS.NET 2005 Editor is
driving me nuts - Rick Strahl's Web Log</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
Not only has my IDE been freezing up like crazy when I saved, it was also doing it
on a regular basis due to the "auto recover" saving every 7 minutes. This fix
has brought my VisualStudio back to where I expected it to be, but just deleting the
offending items from this "ProjectMRUList". In my case a project that I loaded remotely
off of Nate's laptop, which now that we are working remotely, is no where near me
or my home LAN.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Thank you Lars Larsen!</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,cb7b64d6-a0b9-4d51-b491-819d1aed09dd.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2006/09/30/ThankYouLarsLarsen.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:41:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Symptom: When saving a file in Visual Studio 2005, the entire IDE becomes non-responsive
(ie. freezes) for about 10-15 seconds. Meanwhile, the save icon in the status bar
is animated. After 15 seconds, the file is saved and the IDE is responsive again. 
&lt;p&gt;
Solution: "With the help of a network packet analyzer I was able to find out what
stalls Visual Studio. I found that whenever I saved a file, in my web project, Visual
Studio did a DNS lookup on a host on my local network. This host was offline so although
it managed to resolve it's IP address, there was no response from it. After a timeout
period Visual Studio stops trying to connect to this host and goes on with it's business
of saving the file. 
&lt;p&gt;
I searched my registry to find the source of this host name and found it to be present
in: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\8.0\ProjectMRUList. This registry
key is where Visual Studio stores all recent projects that have been opened. In that
list a project, located on a remote computer, was found. When I removed that item
from the registry, Visual Studio no longer took 20 seconds to save it's Web project
files." 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://west-wind.com/weblog/posts/3918.aspx"&gt;Slow VS.NET 2005 Editor is
driving me nuts - Rick Strahl's Web Log&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Not only has my IDE been freezing up like crazy when I saved, it was also doing it
on a regular basis due to the "auto recover" saving every&amp;nbsp;7 minutes. This fix
has brought my VisualStudio back to where I expected it to be, but just deleting the
offending items from this "ProjectMRUList". In my case a project that I loaded remotely
off of Nate's laptop, which now that we are working remotely, is no where near me
or my home LAN.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,cb7b64d6-a0b9-4d51-b491-819d1aed09dd.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
      <category>admin</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=eb51b41c-ef63-4c3a-b76a-680e11c24531</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,eb51b41c-ef63-4c3a-b76a-680e11c24531.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,eb51b41c-ef63-4c3a-b76a-680e11c24531.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=eb51b41c-ef63-4c3a-b76a-680e11c24531</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
Personally I don't think so. Master Pages are very similar to the system I had devised
in ASP.NET 1.1, but with the added benefit of integrating nicely into VisualStudio
and ASP.NET. I find them very easy to understand and straight-forward. However it
is nice to have a good page that explains them.
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
A professional web site will have a standardized look across all pages. For example,
one popular layout type places a navigation menu on the left side of the page, a copyright
on the bottom, and content in the middle. It can be difficult to maintain a standard
look if you must always put the common pieces in place with every web form you build.
In ASP.NET 2.0, master pages will make the job easier.
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://odetocode.com/articles/419.aspx">Master Pages In ASP.NET 2.0</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
Master pages are seriously flexible too. The only bug I've found so far is that not
all HREF or SRC attributes of controls that are "runat=server" will allow you to use
~ to home them, so far I've found that the &lt;link&gt; tag requires you to leave
off the ~/ to do the same thing. Rather odd, but it is what it is.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Master Pages Confusing?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,eb51b41c-ef63-4c3a-b76a-680e11c24531.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2006/07/18/MasterPagesConfusing.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:49:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Personally I don't think so. Master Pages are very similar to the system I had devised
in ASP.NET 1.1, but with the added benefit of integrating nicely into VisualStudio
and ASP.NET. I find them very easy to understand and straight-forward. However it
is nice to have a good page that explains them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
A professional web site will have a standardized look across all pages. For example,
one popular layout type places a navigation menu on the left side of the page, a copyright
on the bottom, and content in the middle. It can be difficult to maintain a standard
look if you must always put the common pieces in place with every web form you build.
In ASP.NET 2.0, master pages will make the job easier.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://odetocode.com/articles/419.aspx"&gt;Master Pages In ASP.NET 2.0&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Master pages are seriously flexible too. The only bug I've found so far is that not
all HREF or SRC attributes of controls that are "runat=server" will allow you to use
~ to home them, so far I've found that the &amp;lt;link&amp;gt; tag requires you to leave
off the ~/ to do the same thing. Rather odd, but it is what it is.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,eb51b41c-ef63-4c3a-b76a-680e11c24531.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
      <category>www</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=eafe9076-fd0d-4f25-949f-dd2ece1c2c52</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,eafe9076-fd0d-4f25-949f-dd2ece1c2c52.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,eafe9076-fd0d-4f25-949f-dd2ece1c2c52.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=eafe9076-fd0d-4f25-949f-dd2ece1c2c52</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
Or alone:
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
One of the things that I’ve been missing in Visual Studio 2005 is the user-configurable
sound that played when the build succeeded or failed. In VS 2003 I had set up the
sounds so I could switch over to another process while the build happened, and the
sound would tell me when it was done. 
</p>
          <p>
From reading newsgroup posts, blogs, etc, it seems that the VS2005 just doesn’t support
these sounds (even though the sounds can be set via Control Panel | Sounds). It just
makes for a quiet build. 
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.codefez.com/Blogs/tabid/58/ctl/ArticleView/mid/404/articleId/217/Silent-Visual-Studio-2005.aspx">Silent
Visual Studio 2005 &gt; Codefez &gt; Blogs</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
At least not on this subject. It drives me bonkers, I just want my "ta da" when it
is successful and a "buzz" when it isn't. Not too much to ask I don't think. I had
to alter the macro a tiny bit. I used the commenters suggestion to use the registry
settings, which seems more finesse; and I altered the replacement to replace "=========="
with "~~~~~~~~~~". I'm not sure why replacing 10 equals with 11 would do anything
but loop endlessly (which is what mine seemed to do).
</p>
        <p align="left">
Update: I see now why they altered the 10 ='s to 11, but that doesn't explain why
it just hangs with 11 =, but with my modified code it will not hang until the 3rd
build or so. Any which way the code eventually (and usually quickly) causes my IDE
to freeze, so I am on the hunt for another method to "fix" this.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>I'm not crazy</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,eafe9076-fd0d-4f25-949f-dd2ece1c2c52.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2006/06/28/ImNotCrazy.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:56:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Or alone:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
One of the things that I’ve been missing in Visual Studio 2005 is the user-configurable
sound that played when the build succeeded or failed. In VS 2003 I had set up the
sounds so I could switch over to another process while the build happened, and the
sound would tell me when it was done. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
From reading newsgroup posts, blogs, etc, it seems that the VS2005 just doesn’t support
these sounds (even though the sounds can be set via Control Panel | Sounds). It just
makes for a quiet build. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.codefez.com/Blogs/tabid/58/ctl/ArticleView/mid/404/articleId/217/Silent-Visual-Studio-2005.aspx"&gt;Silent
Visual Studio 2005 &amp;gt; Codefez &amp;gt; Blogs&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
At least not on this subject. It drives me bonkers, I just want my "ta da" when it
is successful and a "buzz" when it isn't. Not too much to ask I don't think. I had
to alter the macro a tiny bit. I used the commenters suggestion to use the registry
settings, which seems more finesse; and I altered the replacement to replace "=========="
with "~~~~~~~~~~". I'm not sure why replacing 10 equals with 11 would do anything
but loop endlessly (which is what mine seemed to do).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Update: I see now why they altered the 10 ='s to 11, but that doesn't explain why
it just hangs with 11 =, but with my modified code it will not hang until the 3rd
build or so. Any which way the code eventually (and usually quickly) causes my IDE
to freeze, so I am on the hunt for another method to "fix" this.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,eafe9076-fd0d-4f25-949f-dd2ece1c2c52.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=c90d4a20-fe64-4759-9d59-30504e83a841</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,c90d4a20-fe64-4759-9d59-30504e83a841.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,c90d4a20-fe64-4759-9d59-30504e83a841.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=c90d4a20-fe64-4759-9d59-30504e83a841</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <blockquote>With ten minutes of cleanup, you can use a DTS package generated by SQL
Server 2000 within the Visual Studio .NET framework. You'll have all the benefits
of running in the Visual Studio .NET framework, and be able to programmatically control
the behavior of the DTS package. This article will get you there quickly while navigating
a path that isn't always straight forward.</blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/1581801">How
to run a DTS VB package in the .NET framework</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
This will, however, require some serious skillz to maintain these scripts if any changes
need to be made...
</p>
        <p align="left">
Update: Gruskada points out that it is not really SQL Server 2003, except in my heart...
</p>
      </body>
      <title>The Quick and Dirty way to be rid of SQL Server 2000 without recoding all DTS scripts</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,c90d4a20-fe64-4759-9d59-30504e83a841.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2006/04/02/TheQuickAndDirtyWayToBeRidOfSQLServer2000WithoutRecodingAllDTSScripts.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 19:19:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;With ten minutes of cleanup, you can use a DTS package generated by SQL
Server 2000 within the Visual Studio .NET framework. You'll have all the benefits
of running in the Visual Studio .NET framework, and be able to programmatically control
the behavior of the DTS package. This article will get you there quickly while navigating
a path that isn't always straight forward.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/1581801"&gt;How
to run a DTS VB package in the .NET framework&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
This will, however, require some serious skillz to maintain these scripts if any changes
need to be made...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Update: Gruskada points out that it is not really SQL Server 2003, except in my heart...
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,c90d4a20-fe64-4759-9d59-30504e83a841.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=0ab0bc22-2023-4ab6-8d89-c9f5def86da3</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,0ab0bc22-2023-4ab6-8d89-c9f5def86da3.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,0ab0bc22-2023-4ab6-8d89-c9f5def86da3.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=0ab0bc22-2023-4ab6-8d89-c9f5def86da3</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
Apparently I didn't fully understand the licensing of MSDE, since Microsoft advises
us on how to...
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
Build dynamic, data-driven Web applications with Microsoft ASP.NET and MSDE 2000 using
the Workload Governor to limit the number of concurrent operations that the database
engine can perform.
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnmsde2kwrk/html/msde2000webapp.asp?frame=true">Using
MSDE 2000 in a Web Application (MSDE 2000 Web Resource Kit)</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
This continues with <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sql/editions/express/default.mspx">SQL
Server 2005 Express</a>, but the connection pool limit seems to have been increased
to 25 simultaneous connections.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Color me corrected</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,0ab0bc22-2023-4ab6-8d89-c9f5def86da3.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2006/02/02/ColorMeCorrected.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:36:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Apparently I didn't fully understand the licensing of MSDE, since Microsoft advises
us on how to...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Build dynamic, data-driven Web applications with Microsoft ASP.NET and MSDE 2000 using
the Workload Governor to limit the number of concurrent operations that the database
engine can perform.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnmsde2kwrk/html/msde2000webapp.asp?frame=true"&gt;Using
MSDE 2000 in a Web Application (MSDE 2000 Web Resource Kit)&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
This continues with &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sql/editions/express/default.mspx"&gt;SQL
Server 2005 Express&lt;/a&gt;, but the connection pool limit seems to have been increased
to 25 simultaneous connections.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,0ab0bc22-2023-4ab6-8d89-c9f5def86da3.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
      <category>www</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=22390e60-d097-4822-860b-a353db5f741d</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,22390e60-d097-4822-860b-a353db5f741d.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,22390e60-d097-4822-860b-a353db5f741d.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=22390e60-d097-4822-860b-a353db5f741d</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Microsoft now has a free version of SQL
Server:<br /><p></p><blockquote>SQL Server 2005 Express Edition is an easy-to-use version of SQL Server
2005 designed for building simple data-driven applications. The following is a list
of features that help make Express Edition the right choice for your needs.</blockquote><p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sql/editions/express/features.mspx">Microsoft
SQL Server: SQL Server Express Edition Features</a> ]
</p>
But it must be limited in some way. I had assumed that you couldn't use it to host
websites due to some CAL restriction or something, but my initial research seems to
contradict that. It seems to lack DTS, I'm sure it lacks scheduled maintenance, perhaps
there is no granular restoration via transaction logs, surely something needs to be
missing.<br /><br />
Props to <a href="http://geekprime.com/blogs/TheLastWord/">Jonny SQL</a> for not assuming
that it couldn't be used for websites...<br /></body>
      <title>What am I missing?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,22390e60-d097-4822-860b-a353db5f741d.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2006/01/12/WhatAmIMissing.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:13:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Microsoft now has a free version of SQL Server:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;SQL Server 2005 Express Edition is an easy-to-use version of SQL Server
2005 designed for building simple data-driven applications. The following is a list
of features that help make Express Edition the right choice for your needs.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align="right"&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sql/editions/express/features.mspx"&gt;Microsoft
SQL Server: SQL Server Express Edition Features&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
But it must be limited in some way. I had assumed that you couldn't use it to host
websites due to some CAL restriction or something, but my initial research seems to
contradict that. It seems to lack DTS, I'm sure it lacks scheduled maintenance, perhaps
there is no granular restoration via transaction logs, surely something needs to be
missing.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Props to &lt;a href="http://geekprime.com/blogs/TheLastWord/"&gt;Jonny SQL&lt;/a&gt; for not assuming
that it couldn't be used for websites...&lt;br&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,22390e60-d097-4822-860b-a353db5f741d.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=b1fdf7d1-386e-49d6-88d5-a15d5a22f069</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,b1fdf7d1-386e-49d6-88d5-a15d5a22f069.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,b1fdf7d1-386e-49d6-88d5-a15d5a22f069.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=b1fdf7d1-386e-49d6-88d5-a15d5a22f069</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I'm headed to the launch:
</p>
        <blockquote>Join Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer* and key Microsoft Executives for the
launch of Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005, SQL Server™ 2005, and BizTalk® Server 2006!
This all-day event offers an opportunity to learn how the Microsoft application platform
offerings enable organizations to gain better business insight and deliver faster
results by easily connecting people, processes, and information.</blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="">Launch Tour 2005</a> ]
</p>
        <p>
Of course we don't get Cheap Trick and Steve Ballmer like San Francisco did, but I
look forward to getting excited about the new tools I'll be using soon...
</p>
      </body>
      <title>See you there</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,b1fdf7d1-386e-49d6-88d5-a15d5a22f069.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2006/01/11/SeeYouThere.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:18:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
I'm headed to the launch:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Join Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer* and key Microsoft Executives for the
launch of Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005, SQL Server™ 2005, and BizTalk® Server 2006!
This all-day event offers an opportunity to learn how the Microsoft application platform
offerings enable organizations to gain better business insight and deliver faster
results by easily connecting people, processes, and information.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align="right"&gt;
[ &lt;a href=""&gt;Launch Tour 2005&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Of course we don't get Cheap Trick and Steve Ballmer like San Francisco did, but I
look forward to getting excited about the new tools I'll be using soon...
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,b1fdf7d1-386e-49d6-88d5-a15d5a22f069.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=469b4b70-03c4-4ce4-988d-94e78284e907</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,469b4b70-03c4-4ce4-988d-94e78284e907.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,469b4b70-03c4-4ce4-988d-94e78284e907.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=469b4b70-03c4-4ce4-988d-94e78284e907</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <blockquote>
          <p>
Many ISVs have questions about their MSDN subscriptions. All in all this is not surprising.
Where there was one product before, there is now several. 
</p>
          <p>
Basically it all boils down to two very simple questions: 
</p>
          <ol>
            <li>
If I have MSDN Universal subscriptions now, what am I entitled to in terms of Visual
Studio Team System SKU’s?</li>
            <li>
What Visual Studio Team System SKU is right for me?</li>
          </ol>
          <p>
          </p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/w3/archive/2005/11/06/489580.aspx">W^3</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
And, once I read it, I'm sure I will have a better feel for which way <a href="http://www.doceus.com/">our</a> subscriptions
need to go.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Just the guide I need</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,469b4b70-03c4-4ce4-988d-94e78284e907.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2005/11/06/JustTheGuideINeed.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:04:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Many ISVs have questions about their MSDN subscriptions. All in all this is not surprising.
Where there was one product before, there is now several. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Basically it all boils down to two very simple questions: 
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
If I have MSDN Universal subscriptions now, what am I entitled to in terms of Visual
Studio Team System SKU’s?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
What Visual Studio Team System SKU is right for me?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/w3/archive/2005/11/06/489580.aspx"&gt;W^3&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
And, once I read it, I'm sure I will have a better feel for which way &lt;a href="http://www.doceus.com/"&gt;our&lt;/a&gt; subscriptions
need to go.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,469b4b70-03c4-4ce4-988d-94e78284e907.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=cc44be3c-e8b6-4093-9be8-e23b9d0a7802</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,cc44be3c-e8b6-4093-9be8-e23b9d0a7802.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,cc44be3c-e8b6-4093-9be8-e23b9d0a7802.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=cc44be3c-e8b6-4093-9be8-e23b9d0a7802</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <blockquote>107 page paper on generics in C#</blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/vsdata/archive/2005/11/06/generics.aspx">VS Data
Team's WebLog : Four part paper on generics in VS 2005 (by yag)</a> ]
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Note to self: read</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,cc44be3c-e8b6-4093-9be8-e23b9d0a7802.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2005/11/06/NoteToSelfRead.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:51:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;107 page paper on generics in C#&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/vsdata/archive/2005/11/06/generics.aspx"&gt;VS Data
Team's WebLog : Four part paper on generics in VS 2005 (by yag)&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,cc44be3c-e8b6-4093-9be8-e23b9d0a7802.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=4833729d-e10d-480b-93e2-715c1a25c6c7</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,4833729d-e10d-480b-93e2-715c1a25c6c7.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,4833729d-e10d-480b-93e2-715c1a25c6c7.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=4833729d-e10d-480b-93e2-715c1a25c6c7</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
We're looking for a few good coders at my day job:
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
At Doceus our Developers architect and deliver solutions for small to midsize businesses,
associations, and non-profit organizations. Duties include writing specifications
and coding web based applications, generally database driven; and maintaining said
applications, over their life cycle, for our clients.
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.doceus.com/Company/Careers/Advanced_Web_Developer.ashx">doceus
:: accelerate success</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
If you, or anyone you know, is interested, you, or the person you know, can apply
on our site, or via <a href="http://jobsearch.monster.com/getjob.asp?JobID=32492330&amp;AVSDM=2005%2D11%2D02+10%3A47%3A59&amp;Logo=1&amp;q=doceus&amp;cy=us">Monster</a>.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Now Hiring</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,4833729d-e10d-480b-93e2-715c1a25c6c7.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2005/11/02/NowHiring.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:55:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
We're looking for a few good coders at my day job:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
At Doceus our Developers architect and deliver solutions for small to midsize businesses,
associations, and non-profit organizations. Duties include writing specifications
and coding web based applications, generally database driven; and maintaining said
applications, over their life cycle, for our clients.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.doceus.com/Company/Careers/Advanced_Web_Developer.ashx"&gt;doceus
:: accelerate success&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
If you, or anyone you know, is interested, you, or the person you know,&amp;nbsp;can apply
on our site, or via &lt;a href="http://jobsearch.monster.com/getjob.asp?JobID=32492330&amp;amp;AVSDM=2005%2D11%2D02+10%3A47%3A59&amp;amp;Logo=1&amp;amp;q=doceus&amp;amp;cy=us"&gt;Monster&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,4833729d-e10d-480b-93e2-715c1a25c6c7.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
      <category>www</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=22210067-65e9-4cbb-ba2d-81daca38f380</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,22210067-65e9-4cbb-ba2d-81daca38f380.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,22210067-65e9-4cbb-ba2d-81daca38f380.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=22210067-65e9-4cbb-ba2d-81daca38f380</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <blockquote>After a long wait VS.NET and SQL 2005 have been released to manufacturing.</blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcampos/archive/2005/10/27/485805.aspx">Miguel Campos
Blog : VS.NET and SQL 2005 RTM</a> ]
</p>
      </body>
      <title>VS.NET 2005 is not just a rumor!</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,22210067-65e9-4cbb-ba2d-81daca38f380.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2005/10/27/VSNET2005IsNotJustARumor.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 19:54:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;After a long wait VS.NET and SQL 2005 have been released to manufacturing.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcampos/archive/2005/10/27/485805.aspx"&gt;Miguel Campos
Blog : VS.NET and SQL 2005 RTM&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,22210067-65e9-4cbb-ba2d-81daca38f380.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=5aeb2988-ee18-47a5-9995-9fcee65fa2b3</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,5aeb2988-ee18-47a5-9995-9fcee65fa2b3.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,5aeb2988-ee18-47a5-9995-9fcee65fa2b3.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=5aeb2988-ee18-47a5-9995-9fcee65fa2b3</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
Numerous times over the years I stumble across something that requires the use of
LDAP. In the past I've tried to locate a program to assist me in exploring LDAP from
the perspective of the program that will be doing the same thing. I found a weak one
developed by whichever University used to be so very involved with LDAP, but it still
confused me to no end.
</p>
        <p>
Once again I have <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/sds/sds/active_directory_authentication_from_asp__net.asp?frame=true">come
across LDAP</a>. This time, however, I found the program that I wanted all along.
And it's free:
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
LDAP Browser is a lightweight version of LDAP Administrator with limited functionality.
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.ldapbrowser.com/download/">Softerra LDAP Administrator/Browser</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
Do I understand LDAP any more than before? Not really. Does this tool help me to stave
off that requirement? It seems to. I can continue along in my bliss, not truly knowing
what LDAP is, all because the LDAP browser can easily show me the info that I need,
and provide me with URLs that correspond to branches on a directory tree.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>LDAP URLs</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,5aeb2988-ee18-47a5-9995-9fcee65fa2b3.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2005/10/16/LDAPURLs.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 20:53:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Numerous times over the years I stumble across something that requires the use of
LDAP. In the past I've tried to locate a program to assist me in exploring LDAP from
the perspective of the program that will be doing the same thing. I found a weak one
developed by whichever University used to be so very involved with LDAP, but it still
confused me to no end.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Once again I have &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/sds/sds/active_directory_authentication_from_asp__net.asp?frame=true"&gt;come
across LDAP&lt;/a&gt;. This time, however, I found the program that I wanted all along.
And it's free:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
LDAP Browser is a lightweight version of LDAP Administrator with limited functionality.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.ldapbrowser.com/download/"&gt;Softerra LDAP Administrator/Browser&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Do I understand LDAP any more than before? Not really. Does this tool help me to stave
off that requirement? It seems to. I can continue along in my bliss, not truly knowing
what LDAP is, all because the LDAP browser can easily show me the info that I need,
and provide me with URLs that correspond to branches on a directory tree.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,5aeb2988-ee18-47a5-9995-9fcee65fa2b3.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=a706dec0-ddbf-4a52-a3e6-792b03b45130</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,a706dec0-ddbf-4a52-a3e6-792b03b45130.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,a706dec0-ddbf-4a52-a3e6-792b03b45130.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=a706dec0-ddbf-4a52-a3e6-792b03b45130</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <blockquote>For those interested in the freeware version of CodeSmith, the 2.6 freeware
version will continue to be available here.</blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.codesmithtools.com/freeware.aspx">CodeSmith Tools: CodeSmith
2.6 Freeware</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
The reports of your death were greatly exaggerated.
</p>
        <p align="left">
3.0 may be "all that", but until I can tell how 2.6 differs from 3.0 and 3.0 from
3.0 pro, I'll be continuing to sponge off of the good nature of <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ericjsmith/">Eric
J. Smith </a>and his fine free code generator.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>CodeSmith 2.6, I presume?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,a706dec0-ddbf-4a52-a3e6-792b03b45130.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2005/10/16/CodeSmith26IPresume.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:57:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;For those interested in the freeware version of CodeSmith, the 2.6 freeware
version will continue to be available here.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.codesmithtools.com/freeware.aspx"&gt;CodeSmith Tools: CodeSmith
2.6 Freeware&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
The reports of your death were greatly exaggerated.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
3.0 may be "all that", but until I can tell how 2.6 differs from 3.0 and 3.0 from
3.0 pro, I'll be continuing to sponge off of the good nature of &lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ericjsmith/"&gt;Eric
J. Smith &lt;/a&gt;and his fine free code generator.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,a706dec0-ddbf-4a52-a3e6-792b03b45130.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=3c12cfea-eeab-49c0-a4c3-f97ab7150daa</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,3c12cfea-eeab-49c0-a4c3-f97ab7150daa.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,3c12cfea-eeab-49c0-a4c3-f97ab7150daa.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=3c12cfea-eeab-49c0-a4c3-f97ab7150daa</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
David Kearns III thinks so:
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
It appears that what Apple has done is to take meaningful, desirable third-party services
and applications and "roll their own" inside the operating system, thus presenting
users with a fuller package of features. Of course, the third parties that had been
providing these services as add-ons now are left out in the cold. 
</p>
          <p>
When Microsoft does this, it's denounced as a predator and a monopolist. When Apple
does it, it's praised as an innovator. Still, if Microsoft didn't have Apple to point
to as "competition," there might be more calls for government regulation of monopoly
operating systems. We certainly don't want government bureaucrats designing our server
and desktop environments. 
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2005/050205kearns.html">Apple: Predator
or protagonist?</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
And I have to agree. Of course I have little choice being focused on Microsoft development
tools. Even if someone gave me a Mac to replace every PC in my network, I couldn't
use them to deliver Microsoft solutions, and I have to relearn my staff in the ways
of PHP and Java (instead of the ColdFusion and .NET that we use now). Still resulting
in a loss.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Double standard?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,3c12cfea-eeab-49c0-a4c3-f97ab7150daa.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2005/05/02/DoubleStandard.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 20:33:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
David Kearns III thinks so:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
It appears that what Apple has done is to take meaningful, desirable third-party services
and applications and "roll their own" inside the operating system, thus presenting
users with a fuller package of features. Of course, the third parties that had been
providing these services as add-ons now are left out in the cold. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
When Microsoft does this, it's denounced as a predator and a monopolist. When Apple
does it, it's praised as an innovator. Still, if Microsoft didn't have Apple to point
to as "competition," there might be more calls for government regulation of monopoly
operating systems. We certainly don't want government bureaucrats designing our server
and desktop environments. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2005/050205kearns.html"&gt;Apple: Predator
or protagonist?&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
And I have to agree. Of course I have little choice being focused on Microsoft development
tools. Even if someone gave me a Mac to replace every PC in my network, I couldn't
use them to deliver Microsoft solutions, and I have to relearn my staff in the ways
of PHP and Java (instead of the ColdFusion and .NET that we use now). Still resulting
in a loss.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,3c12cfea-eeab-49c0-a4c3-f97ab7150daa.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
      <category>www</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=16fdbf82-8b52-40cd-860f-0a34645d0fd3</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,16fdbf82-8b52-40cd-860f-0a34645d0fd3.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,16fdbf82-8b52-40cd-860f-0a34645d0fd3.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=16fdbf82-8b52-40cd-860f-0a34645d0fd3</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
You would think that by now we would have a good technical solution to the question
"when can you fit me in?". For my coworkers Exchange and Outlook work like a charm.
Outlook even has the ability to post my free/busy data to the 'net via ftp, webdav,
or locally. However only Outlook understands that file (even though it is part of
the <a href="http://www.imc.org/ietf-calendar/index.html">iCalendar</a> standard).
</p>
        <p>
I did find a few people at the fringes who deal with this sort of stuff. The most
helpful was <a href="http://www.ifreebusy.com/">iFreeBusy.com</a>, but they seem to
have a good system for letting my Outlook know if someone who uses <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/ical/">iCal</a> is
busy, and not for publishing my free/busy data to the web.
</p>
        <p>
One guy who works for a church <a href="http://www.getchurch.org/~freebusy/">rolled
his own solution</a>, which is <a href="http://www.intelliscript.net/static/freebusy_folder.shtml">downloadable</a>,
but requires perl, which I didn't feel like messing with. Not to mention that it doesn't
really detail what version of perl, or what modules are required.
</p>
        <p>
Frustrated, I turned to the only possible solution left: hacking. Witness the newest
page to davidkearns.com: <a href="http://davidkearns.com/IFB.aspx">free/busy</a>.
I simply set my outlook to publish my free/busy data to my website, and then load
that file, parse it out, build the object, and render it all purty. Add a calendar
to select which day, and voila. I spent less time on the solution than all the research
that determined I needed to build it myself. Oh well, I now know quite a bit about
standard calendar formats...
</p>
        <p>
Update: iFreeBusy.com is already on top of a solution. Try subscribing to <a href="http://www.ifreebusy.com/ifbadkdc/david.vfb?tocal">my
calendar</a> in Sunbird, or another Mozilla type jobby with the <a href="http://www.ifreebusy.com/ifbadkdc/david.vfb?tocal">calendar
add-on</a>. (Though since Outlook can only publish automatically to one place, my
homepage wins out and this data will get old).
</p>
      </body>
      <title>When can you fit me in?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,16fdbf82-8b52-40cd-860f-0a34645d0fd3.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2005/04/25/WhenCanYouFitMeIn.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 03:06:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
You would think that by now we would have a good technical&amp;nbsp;solution to the question
"when can you fit me in?". For my coworkers Exchange and Outlook work like a charm.
Outlook even has the ability to post my free/busy data to the 'net via ftp, webdav,
or locally. However only Outlook understands that file (even though it is part of
the &lt;a href="http://www.imc.org/ietf-calendar/index.html"&gt;iCalendar&lt;/a&gt; standard).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I did find a few people at the fringes who deal with this sort of stuff. The most
helpful was &lt;a href="http://www.ifreebusy.com/"&gt;iFreeBusy.com&lt;/a&gt;, but they seem to
have a good system for letting my Outlook know if someone who uses &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/ical/"&gt;iCal&lt;/a&gt; is
busy, and not for publishing my free/busy data to the web.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
One guy who works for a church &lt;a href="http://www.getchurch.org/~freebusy/"&gt;rolled
his own solution&lt;/a&gt;, which is &lt;a href="http://www.intelliscript.net/static/freebusy_folder.shtml"&gt;downloadable&lt;/a&gt;,
but requires perl, which I didn't feel like messing with. Not to mention that it doesn't
really detail what version of perl, or what modules are required.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Frustrated, I turned to the only possible solution left: hacking. Witness the newest
page to davidkearns.com: &lt;a href="http://davidkearns.com/IFB.aspx"&gt;free/busy&lt;/a&gt;.
I simply set my outlook to publish my free/busy data to my website, and then load
that file, parse it out, build the object, and render it all purty. Add a calendar
to select which day, and voila. I spent less time on the solution than all the research
that determined I needed to build it myself. Oh well, I now know quite a bit about
standard calendar formats...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Update: iFreeBusy.com is already on top of a solution. Try subscribing to &lt;a href="http://www.ifreebusy.com/ifbadkdc/david.vfb?tocal"&gt;my
calendar&lt;/a&gt; in Sunbird, or another Mozilla type jobby with the &lt;a href="http://www.ifreebusy.com/ifbadkdc/david.vfb?tocal"&gt;calendar
add-on&lt;/a&gt;. (Though since Outlook can only publish automatically to one place, my
homepage wins out and this data will get old).
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,16fdbf82-8b52-40cd-860f-0a34645d0fd3.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
      <category>www</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=dabbb1f1-2e41-4d57-90d4-a6f1871ec28b</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,dabbb1f1-2e41-4d57-90d4-a6f1871ec28b.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,dabbb1f1-2e41-4d57-90d4-a6f1871ec28b.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=dabbb1f1-2e41-4d57-90d4-a6f1871ec28b</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
But he did name it. And I think it works:
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
Q. Why did you feel the need to give this a name? 
</p>
          <p>
A. I needed something shorter than “Asynchronous+JavaScript+CSS+DOM+XMLHttpRequest”
to use when discussing this approach with clients. 
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000385.php">adaptive
path ajax: a new approach to web applications</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
Props to <a href="http://www.dgibson.net/">Gibson</a> for pointing out the "new" name
for this approach.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>This guy didn't invent AJAX</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,dabbb1f1-2e41-4d57-90d4-a6f1871ec28b.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2005/03/22/ThisGuyDidntInventAJAX.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:24:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But he did name it. And I think it works:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Q. Why did you feel the need to give this a name? 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A. I needed something shorter than “Asynchronous+JavaScript+CSS+DOM+XMLHttpRequest”
to use when discussing this approach with clients. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000385.php"&gt;adaptive
path ajax: a new approach to web applications&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Props to &lt;a href="http://www.dgibson.net/"&gt;Gibson&lt;/a&gt; for pointing out the "new" name
for this approach.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,dabbb1f1-2e41-4d57-90d4-a6f1871ec28b.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=b79d3706-171c-4550-8f86-b0edee4d95db</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,b79d3706-171c-4550-8f86-b0edee4d95db.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,b79d3706-171c-4550-8f86-b0edee4d95db.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=b79d3706-171c-4550-8f86-b0edee4d95db</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
And jumped over to SourceForge:
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
dasBlog Community Edition is an ASP.NET weblogging application. It runs on ASP.NET
1.1 and is developed in C#. dasBlog, an evolution of the BlogX weblog engine, adds
lots of additional features like Trackback, Pingback, Mail notifications, full Blogger/M
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/dasblogce">SourceForge.net: Project Info
- newtelligence dasBlog Community Edition</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
Not having worked on these open source projects, I'm not sure what the difference
is between <a href="http://sourceforge.net/">SourceForge </a>and <a href="http://www.gotdotnet.com/">GotDotNet</a>,
but I do know that SourceForge has always seemed quicker. From what I read previously
on the GotDotNet forums for dasBlog this release should have quite a few fixes in
it. I guess I'll be <a href="http://sourceforge.net/">WinMerging </a>some code this
weekend.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>dasBlog 1.7 is out</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,b79d3706-171c-4550-8f86-b0edee4d95db.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2005/01/28/dasBlog17IsOut.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:04:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
And jumped over to SourceForge:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
dasBlog Community Edition is an ASP.NET weblogging application. It runs on ASP.NET
1.1 and is developed in C#. dasBlog, an evolution of the BlogX weblog engine, adds
lots of additional features like Trackback, Pingback, Mail notifications, full Blogger/M
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/dasblogce"&gt;SourceForge.net: Project Info
- newtelligence dasBlog Community Edition&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Not having worked on these open source projects, I'm not sure what the difference
is between &lt;a href="http://sourceforge.net/"&gt;SourceForge &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a href="http://www.gotdotnet.com/"&gt;GotDotNet&lt;/a&gt;,
but I do know that SourceForge has always seemed quicker. From what I read previously
on the GotDotNet forums for dasBlog this release should have quite a few fixes in
it. I guess I'll be &lt;a href="http://sourceforge.net/"&gt;WinMerging &lt;/a&gt;some code this
weekend.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,b79d3706-171c-4550-8f86-b0edee4d95db.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=c347bbc5-28ab-4912-a926-d9b69eb3e822</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,c347bbc5-28ab-4912-a926-d9b69eb3e822.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,c347bbc5-28ab-4912-a926-d9b69eb3e822.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=c347bbc5-28ab-4912-a926-d9b69eb3e822</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
...perhaps. At least this looks very interesting. I keep meaning to read it in depth,
but never seem to have the time. Perhaps if I blog about it I'll get around to it...
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
Consistently delivering high-quality technology solutions on time and on budget is
challenging for any business. The Microsoft Solutions Framework (MSF) provides people
and process guidance—the proven practices of Microsoft—to help teams and
organizations become more successful in delivering business-driven technology solutions
to their customers. MSF is a deliberate and disciplined approach to technology projects
based on a defined set of principles, models, disciplines, concepts, guidelines, and
proven practices from Microsoft. 
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/enterprise/msf/">Visual Studio: Microsoft
Solutions Framework (MSF)</a> ]
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Very Interesting...</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,c347bbc5-28ab-4912-a926-d9b69eb3e822.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2005/01/26/VeryInteresting.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:40:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
...perhaps. At least this looks very interesting. I keep meaning to read it in depth,
but never seem to have the time. Perhaps if I blog about it I'll get around to it...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Consistently delivering high-quality technology solutions on time and on budget is
challenging for any business. The Microsoft Solutions Framework (MSF) provides people
and process guidance&amp;#8212;the proven practices of Microsoft&amp;#8212;to help teams and
organizations become more successful in delivering business-driven technology solutions
to their customers. MSF is a deliberate and disciplined approach to technology projects
based on a defined set of principles, models, disciplines, concepts, guidelines, and
proven practices from Microsoft. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/enterprise/msf/"&gt;Visual Studio: Microsoft
Solutions Framework (MSF)&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,c347bbc5-28ab-4912-a926-d9b69eb3e822.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=886248c3-8563-48e8-a6fd-441fa0c94824</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,886248c3-8563-48e8-a6fd-441fa0c94824.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,886248c3-8563-48e8-a6fd-441fa0c94824.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=886248c3-8563-48e8-a6fd-441fa0c94824</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
I'm confused, I see 4 pros for c# followed by 3 cons <strong>against</strong> VB:
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
The differences between C# and Visual Basic .NET are mostly to suit different programmer's
backgrounds. Unfortunately, there are some other differences. The following is a list
(other than those that were mentioned when I discussed Microsoft's "going back") of
some examples of the differences between C# and Visual Basic .NET:
</p>
          <ul>
            <li>
              <p>
                <i>C# warns you if a function is missing a return statement</i>—This catches
a few bugs automatically.
</p>
            </li>
            <li>
              <p>
                <i>C# requires XML-tagged documentation to be written in the code</i>—Seems
to be a good idea to drag out the comments from the code and use it for different
scenarios.
</p>
            </li>
            <li>
              <p>
                <i>C# can switch to Unmanaged mode</i>—This can easily be achieved in Visual
Basic .NET by just calling a C# class that takes care of it. Still, I find it nice
to have the same possibilities in both environments.
</p>
            </li>
            <li>
              <p>
                <i>You can use</i>
                <tt>Using()</tt>
                <b>
                </b>
                <i>in C# to tell that an object should
be automatically </i>
                <tt>Dispose()</tt>
                <i>ed when going out of scope</i>—That
is very handy, for example, for connection and file objects that you don't want to
wait for being garbage collected.
</p>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <p>
To be fair, Visual Basic .NET has some advantages over C# too:
</p>
          <ul>
            <li>
              <p>
                <i>Visual Basic .NET differs </i>
                <tt>Inherits</tt>
                <b>
                </b>
                <i>from </i>
                <tt>Implements</tt>—In
C#, it's written in both cases with a colon.
</p>
            </li>
            <li>
              <p>
                <i>The event syntax is simple in Visual Basic .NET</i>—It's as clean and intuitive
as in VB6. In C#, you have to take care of more by hand.
</p>
            </li>
            <li>
              <p>
                <i>Visual Basic .NET is not case sensitive</i>—This is a matter of taste, but
I prefer non–case sensitive. Otherwise, there is always somebody that will have
two methods in a single class named something like <tt>getData()</tt> and <tt>GetData()</tt>.
</p>
            </li>
          </ul>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=25753&amp;seqNum=6">Introduction
to COM and .NET</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
Inherits and implements are so similar concepts, why not use :, yet when doing events
the extra code is deemed a pain? When it gives more flexibility? And case sensitivity
is a plus, not a minus, doesn't everyone know that yet?
</p>
      </body>
      <title>C# Versus Visual Basic .NET </title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,886248c3-8563-48e8-a6fd-441fa0c94824.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/12/22/CVersusVisualBasicNET.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:01:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I'm confused, I see 4 pros for c# followed by 3 cons &lt;strong&gt;against&lt;/strong&gt; VB:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
The differences between C# and Visual Basic .NET are mostly to suit different programmer's
backgrounds. Unfortunately, there are some other differences. The following is a list
(other than those that were mentioned when I discussed Microsoft's "going back") of
some examples of the differences between C# and Visual Basic .NET:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;C# warns you if a function is missing a return statement&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8212;This catches
a few bugs automatically.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;C# requires XML-tagged documentation to be written in the code&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8212;Seems
to be a good idea to drag out the comments from the code and use it for different
scenarios.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;C# can switch to Unmanaged mode&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8212;This can easily be achieved in Visual
Basic .NET by just calling a C# class that takes care of it. Still, I find it nice
to have the same possibilities in both environments.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;You can use&lt;/i&gt; &lt;tt&gt;Using()&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;i&gt;in C# to tell that an object should
be automatically &lt;/i&gt;&lt;tt&gt;Dispose()&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;i&gt;ed when going out of scope&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8212;That
is very handy, for example, for connection and file objects that you don't want to
wait for being garbage collected.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
To be fair, Visual Basic .NET has some advantages over C# too:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Visual Basic .NET differs &lt;/i&gt;&lt;tt&gt;Inherits&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;i&gt;from &lt;/i&gt;&lt;tt&gt;Implements&lt;/tt&gt;&amp;#8212;In
C#, it's written in both cases with a colon.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;The event syntax is simple in Visual Basic .NET&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8212;It's as clean and intuitive
as in VB6. In C#, you have to take care of more by hand.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Visual Basic .NET is not case sensitive&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8212;This is a matter of taste, but
I prefer non&amp;#8211;case sensitive. Otherwise, there is always somebody that will have
two methods in a single class named something like &lt;tt&gt;getData()&lt;/tt&gt; and &lt;tt&gt;GetData()&lt;/tt&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=25753&amp;amp;seqNum=6"&gt;Introduction
to COM and .NET&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Inherits and implements are so similar concepts, why not use :, yet when doing events
the extra code is deemed a pain? When it gives more flexibility? And case sensitivity
is a plus, not a minus, doesn't everyone know that yet?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,886248c3-8563-48e8-a6fd-441fa0c94824.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=726f94fb-2675-482a-9ebe-2c9e87db171a</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,726f94fb-2675-482a-9ebe-2c9e87db171a.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,726f94fb-2675-482a-9ebe-2c9e87db171a.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=726f94fb-2675-482a-9ebe-2c9e87db171a</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
Version Four of their Web Service, and still none work with VisualStudio smoothly.
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
After a bit of research I came across this helpful post on the official Amazon.com
Web Services discussion board which explains how to fix the issues I was having
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://cadred.net/blog/archive/2004/11/09/229.aspx">Amazon Web Services
and .NET</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
Can't Microsoft just send them a copy for them to test with?
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Amazon must hate Microsoft</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,726f94fb-2675-482a-9ebe-2c9e87db171a.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/12/16/AmazonMustHateMicrosoft.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:58:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Version Four of their Web Service, and still none work with VisualStudio smoothly.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
After a bit of research I came across this helpful post on the official Amazon.com
Web Services discussion board which explains how to fix the issues I was having
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://cadred.net/blog/archive/2004/11/09/229.aspx"&gt;Amazon Web Services
and .NET&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Can't Microsoft just send them a copy for them to test with?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,726f94fb-2675-482a-9ebe-2c9e87db171a.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=1f42339c-bee2-482d-bd79-526d082955bf</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,1f42339c-bee2-482d-bd79-526d082955bf.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,1f42339c-bee2-482d-bd79-526d082955bf.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=1f42339c-bee2-482d-bd79-526d082955bf</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <blockquote>On October 4th, 2004, we released version 4.0 of the Amazon E-Commerce
Service (ECS), previously referred to in beta as AWS 4.0. ECS 4.0 provides unprecedented
access to Amazon’s product data and E-Commerce functionality allowing developers,
Web site owners and merchants to leverage the data and functionality that Amazon uses
to power its own E-Commerce business. It provides access to detailed product and pricing
information for all items across all Amazon product categories – this information
includes detailed product attributes, product images and customer-supplied content
such as reviews, Wish Lists and Listmania lists. In addition, ECS 4.0 provides advanced
search, remote shopping cart and enhanced Wish List search capabilities for enhancing
and personalizing your Web site or application. </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html/103-6065904-0487064?node=3435361&amp;">Amazon.com</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
I'm a bit put off that I didn't get the memo. I've been irritated with the 3.0 AWS
for a while now, my updates frequently get a 530 error, wish lists stopped working
so long ago, their entire catalog is old or unavailable through 3.0. Good to see they
have the replacement. Bad to see that they didn't send out an email.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>I didn't get the email...</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,1f42339c-bee2-482d-bd79-526d082955bf.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/12/10/IDidntGetTheEmail.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:58:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;On October 4th, 2004, we released version 4.0 of the Amazon E-Commerce
Service (ECS), previously referred to in beta as AWS 4.0. ECS 4.0 provides unprecedented
access to Amazon&amp;#8217;s product data and E-Commerce functionality allowing developers,
Web site owners and merchants to leverage the data and functionality that Amazon uses
to power its own E-Commerce business. It provides access to detailed product and pricing
information for all items across all Amazon product categories &amp;#8211; this information
includes detailed product attributes, product images and customer-supplied content
such as reviews, Wish Lists and Listmania lists. In addition, ECS 4.0 provides advanced
search, remote shopping cart and enhanced Wish List search capabilities for enhancing
and personalizing your Web site or application. &lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html/103-6065904-0487064?node=3435361&amp;amp;"&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
I'm a bit put off that I didn't get the memo. I've been irritated with the 3.0 AWS
for a while now, my updates frequently get a 530 error, wish lists stopped working
so long ago, their entire catalog is old or unavailable through 3.0. Good to see they
have the replacement. Bad to see that they didn't send out an email.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,1f42339c-bee2-482d-bd79-526d082955bf.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=f39963d2-229a-48be-abfd-1a8af95ceda2</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,f39963d2-229a-48be-abfd-1a8af95ceda2.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,f39963d2-229a-48be-abfd-1a8af95ceda2.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=f39963d2-229a-48be-abfd-1a8af95ceda2</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
This sounds rather nifty to me:
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
New Atlanta Communications, a leading producer of advanced server-side technologies,
is pleased to announce a technology preview of BlueDragon for the Microsoft .NET Framework,
the newest version of its BlueDragon product family for deploying ColdFusion Markup
Language (CFML) web applications, is now available for download and testing. Deployment
options now range from BlueDragon Server, a standalone CFML application server, to
any Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE™) and Microsoft .NET application server.
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.newatlanta.com/corporate/news/bluedragon_dotnet_technology_preview.jsp">New
Atlanta Corporate News</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
I did try and get the 6.0 release, standalone version, running with some code, and
I had a few issues, but none that would make me question any of their claims (it was
a half hearted attempt). Running on top of .NET sounds interesting, but I am curious
how it works in reality. And what ability do I have to extend my code with .NET?
</p>
        <p align="left">
Anyone with a bit of extra time on their hands could feel free to research this,
and let me know what you think. Really, go ahead, I won't stop you.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>ColdFusion or .NET? How about both?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,f39963d2-229a-48be-abfd-1a8af95ceda2.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/07/26/ColdFusionOrNETHowAboutBoth.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:38:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This sounds rather nifty to me:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
New Atlanta Communications, a leading producer of advanced server-side technologies,
is pleased to announce a technology preview of BlueDragon for the Microsoft .NET Framework,
the newest version of its BlueDragon product family for deploying ColdFusion Markup
Language (CFML) web applications, is now available for download and testing. Deployment
options now range from BlueDragon Server, a standalone CFML application server, to
any Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE&amp;#8482;) and Microsoft .NET application server.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.newatlanta.com/corporate/news/bluedragon_dotnet_technology_preview.jsp"&gt;New
Atlanta Corporate News&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
I did try and get the 6.0 release, standalone version, running with some code, and
I had a few issues, but none that would make me question any of their claims (it was
a half hearted attempt). Running on top of .NET sounds interesting, but I am curious
how it works in reality. And what ability do I have to extend my code with .NET?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Anyone with&amp;nbsp;a bit of extra time on their hands could feel free to research this,
and let me know what you think. Really, go ahead, I won't stop you.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,f39963d2-229a-48be-abfd-1a8af95ceda2.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=a80ea962-cc07-4c28-8d49-3037781e2958</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,a80ea962-cc07-4c28-8d49-3037781e2958.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,a80ea962-cc07-4c28-8d49-3037781e2958.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=a80ea962-cc07-4c28-8d49-3037781e2958</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <blockquote>Web.config and App.config have can have many different configuration options
but it is difficult to remember what some of the less commonly used options are. This
article provides a schema definition for .NET configuration files such as Web.config
and App.config. The schema makes Visual Studio .NET help you out by displaying intellisense
when working in these files.</blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.radsoftware.com.au/web/CodeZone/Articles/IntellisenseWebConfig.aspx" target="_blank">Get
Intellisense for Web.config and App.config in Visual Studio .NET</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
The one caveat of removing the xmlns just before saving is a small price to pay.
What I don't understand is if it is this easy, why wouldn't the architects of VS.NET
have put this in but with a bit more finesse?
</p>
      </body>
      <title>web.config made easy</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,a80ea962-cc07-4c28-8d49-3037781e2958.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/07/20/webconfigMadeEasy.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:02:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Web.config and App.config have can have many different configuration options
but it is difficult to remember what some of the less commonly used options are. This
article provides a schema definition for .NET configuration files such as Web.config
and App.config. The schema makes Visual Studio .NET help you out by displaying intellisense
when working in these files.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.radsoftware.com.au/web/CodeZone/Articles/IntellisenseWebConfig.aspx" target=_blank&gt;Get
Intellisense for Web.config and App.config in Visual Studio .NET&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
The one caveat of removing the xmlns just before saving is&amp;nbsp;a small price to pay.
What I don't understand is if it is this easy, why wouldn't the architects of VS.NET
have put this in but with a bit more finesse?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,a80ea962-cc07-4c28-8d49-3037781e2958.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=1127ca9e-cb27-4d65-9e65-50fb8cad9135</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,1127ca9e-cb27-4d65-9e65-50fb8cad9135.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,1127ca9e-cb27-4d65-9e65-50fb8cad9135.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=1127ca9e-cb27-4d65-9e65-50fb8cad9135</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
Here's a somewhat interesting article:
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
            <strong>MARS </strong>
          </p>
          <p>
When you select a set of rows using a SQL SELECT statement, either as a stand-alone
or inside a stored procedure, SQL Server doesn't automatically produce a cursor over
the set of rows as some databases do. Instead, it uses an optimized method to stream
the resultset across the network, on occasions reading from the database buffers directly
as the network library pulls the data in packet-size chunks. This is known as "the
default resultset of SQL Sever" in SQL Server Boks Oline, or "the cursorless resultset".
In versions of SQL Server prior to SQL Server 2005, there could only be a single cursorless
resultset active on a single connection at a time.
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/data/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnvs05/html/ado2featurematrix.asp">Data
Access and Storage Developer Center: ADO.NET 2.0 Feature Matrix</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
But the real reason for pointing out this article (besides MARS technology) is the
new SQL Server Boks Oline. I've done a bit of research and no one has any details
about this new feature of MS SQL. But it sounds pretty spiffy if you ask me...
</p>
      </body>
      <title>New Microsoft Database Fun</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,1127ca9e-cb27-4d65-9e65-50fb8cad9135.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/07/13/NewMicrosoftDatabaseFun.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:35:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Here's a somewhat interesting article:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;MARS &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
When you select a set of rows using a SQL SELECT statement, either as a stand-alone
or inside a stored procedure, SQL Server doesn't automatically produce a cursor over
the set of rows as some databases do. Instead, it uses an optimized method to stream
the resultset across the network, on occasions reading from the database buffers directly
as the network library pulls the data in packet-size chunks. This is known as "the
default resultset of SQL Sever" in SQL Server Boks Oline, or "the cursorless resultset".
In versions of SQL Server prior to SQL Server 2005, there could only be a single cursorless
resultset active on a single connection at a time.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/data/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnvs05/html/ado2featurematrix.asp"&gt;Data
Access and Storage Developer Center: ADO.NET 2.0 Feature Matrix&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
But the real reason for pointing out this article (besides MARS technology) is the
new SQL Server Boks Oline. I've done a bit of research and no one has any details
about this new feature of MS SQL. But it sounds pretty spiffy if you ask me...
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,1127ca9e-cb27-4d65-9e65-50fb8cad9135.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=a865b370-4f50-4ae5-b45b-9e6450c62f42</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,a865b370-4f50-4ae5-b45b-9e6450c62f42.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,a865b370-4f50-4ae5-b45b-9e6450c62f42.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=a865b370-4f50-4ae5-b45b-9e6450c62f42</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
Anyone else dislike CDOSYS (née CDONTS) as much as I do? Anyone else
have a preferred substitute?
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
FreeSMTP.Net is a free SMTP component for the creation and sending of e-mail messages
in .Net. Written in pure C#, FreeSMTP.Net is fully managed and incredibly fast. It
is totally object oriented and flat out the easiest way to create and send Internet
email. Best of all, it's free.
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.quiksoftcorp.com/freesmtp/">VB.Net, ASP.Net, C#...</a> ]
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Free SMTP Component for .Net</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,a865b370-4f50-4ae5-b45b-9e6450c62f42.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/07/08/FreeSMTPComponentForNet.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 13:15:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Anyone else dislike CDOSYS (n&amp;#233;e&amp;nbsp;CDONTS)&amp;nbsp;as much as I do? Anyone else
have a preferred substitute?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
FreeSMTP.Net is a free SMTP component for the creation and sending of e-mail messages
in .Net. Written in pure C#, FreeSMTP.Net is fully managed and incredibly fast. It
is totally object oriented and flat out the easiest way to create and send Internet
email. Best of all, it's free.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.quiksoftcorp.com/freesmtp/"&gt;VB.Net, ASP.Net, C#...&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,a865b370-4f50-4ae5-b45b-9e6450c62f42.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=3f02db79-3196-46c3-99f3-582cea82829a</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,3f02db79-3196-46c3-99f3-582cea82829a.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,3f02db79-3196-46c3-99f3-582cea82829a.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=3f02db79-3196-46c3-99f3-582cea82829a</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
Now that my .NET skills are decent enough, and I know what I can do an how fast I
can do it, I'd love to use some of that in legacy code. Black Knight might be the
answer, but how can I tell. It is an obscure enough “thing” and I'm not
even sure exactly what it is. I have noticed that I can still build CFX tags in VisualStudio
2003 just as I could in VisualStudio 6, but since I've never written any c++ code,
and everything that I disliked about c was increased 10 fold in c++, I don't think
I'll be doing that any time soon.
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
Black Knight™ is the first extension to allow CFML developers to make full use
of native .NET objects without having to build a custom COM bridge. This alone can
save an IT shop dozens of hours of development time.
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.montarasoftware.com/go/9d58a59e-df02-1157-affb-e87c411e1c8f">Black
Knight™</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
What would be awesome is if someone familiar with this product just happened to stumble
across my site, and offered up their opinion. Since I doubt that will happen, the
idle speculation of current and previous coworkers will have to suffice.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>CF.NET Custom Tags?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,3f02db79-3196-46c3-99f3-582cea82829a.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/07/08/CFNETCustomTags.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 13:05:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Now that my .NET skills are decent enough, and I know what I can do an how fast I
can do it, I'd love to use some of that in legacy code. Black Knight might be the
answer, but how can I tell. It is an obscure enough &amp;#8220;thing&amp;#8221; and I'm not
even sure exactly what it is. I have noticed that I can still build CFX tags in VisualStudio
2003 just as I could in VisualStudio 6, but since I've never written any c++ code,
and everything that I disliked about c was increased 10 fold in c++, I don't think
I'll be doing that any time soon.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Black Knight&amp;#8482; is the first extension to allow CFML developers to make full use
of native .NET objects without having to build a custom COM bridge. This alone can
save an IT shop dozens of hours of development time.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.montarasoftware.com/go/9d58a59e-df02-1157-affb-e87c411e1c8f"&gt;Black
Knight&amp;#8482;&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
What would be awesome is if someone familiar with this product just happened to stumble
across my site, and offered up their opinion. Since I doubt that will happen, the
idle speculation of current and previous coworkers will have to suffice.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,3f02db79-3196-46c3-99f3-582cea82829a.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=65cf6edf-314e-460d-88a0-afac33da2c75</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,65cf6edf-314e-460d-88a0-afac33da2c75.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,65cf6edf-314e-460d-88a0-afac33da2c75.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=65cf6edf-314e-460d-88a0-afac33da2c75</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
Hind sight is 20/20, isn't it?
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
When you access a page after an AppDomain load, for example, when you modify the Bin
directory or the Web.config file on computers running Microsoft Index Services, you
may receive the following error message: 
<br /></p>
          <div class="errormsg">
            <h3>Server Error in '/MyWebApp' Application
</h3>
            <h4>Configuration Error
</h4>
            <strong>Description</strong>: An error occurred during the processing of a configuration
file required to service this request. Please review the specific error details below
and modify your configuration file appropriately.<br /><br /><strong>Parser Error Message</strong>: Access is denied: 'mydll'.
</div>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;329065">Microsoft
Knowledge Base Article 329065</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
I'm thinking that every time I had an error that looked like this, it was the
friggin' Indexing Service.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Access Denied Error When You Make Code Modifications</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,65cf6edf-314e-460d-88a0-afac33da2c75.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/07/02/AccessDeniedErrorWhenYouMakeCodeModifications.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2004 12:42:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Hind sight is 20/20, isn't it?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
When you access a page after an AppDomain load, for example, when you modify the Bin
directory or the Web.config file on computers running Microsoft Index Services, you
may receive the following error message: 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=errormsg&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;Server Error in '/MyWebApp' Application
&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;h4&gt;Configuration Error
&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Description&lt;/strong&gt;: An error occurred during the processing of a configuration
file required to service this request. Please review the specific error details below
and modify your configuration file appropriately.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Parser Error Message&lt;/strong&gt;: Access is denied: 'mydll'.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;329065"&gt;Microsoft
Knowledge Base Article 329065&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
I'm thinking that&amp;nbsp;every time I had an error that looked like this, it was the
friggin' Indexing Service.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,65cf6edf-314e-460d-88a0-afac33da2c75.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=5ef207f0-588c-417d-80ab-fccd43dcb615</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,5ef207f0-588c-417d-80ab-fccd43dcb615.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>David Kearns</dc:creator>
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,5ef207f0-588c-417d-80ab-fccd43dcb615.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=5ef207f0-588c-417d-80ab-fccd43dcb615</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <blockquote>I now have a single feed (the old ones are redirected to it) that has
the entire body of my entries. Enjoy, LiveJournal people and other syndicated readers!</blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.joegrossberg.com/archives/001541.html">Joe Grossberg </a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
And this is the first of many blog entries that I can't syndicate.
</p>
        <p align="left">
Since I have rolled my own Aggregator, it only does RSS and not ATOM. I wasn't aware
that ATOM was so far ahead in acceptance that people were thinking of ditching RSS
completly...
</p>
        <p align="left">
And, of course, it may be quite a while until I find a way to pull the ATOM code.
</p>
        <p align="left">
Though if anyone has a clue where to find an open source .NET ATOM consumption library,
or one that does RSS and ATOM and I'll just replace the code I use, feel free to comment
and let me know.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Full-Bodied Feeds?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,5ef207f0-588c-417d-80ab-fccd43dcb615.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/06/24/FullBodiedFeeds.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:43:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;I now have a single feed (the old ones are redirected to it) that has
the entire body of my entries. Enjoy, LiveJournal people and other syndicated readers!&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.joegrossberg.com/archives/001541.html"&gt;Joe Grossberg&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
And this is the first of many blog entries that I can't syndicate.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Since I have rolled my own Aggregator, it only does RSS and not ATOM. I wasn't aware
that ATOM was so far ahead in acceptance that people were thinking of ditching RSS
completly...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
And, of course, it may be quite a while until I find a way to pull the ATOM code.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Though if anyone has a clue where to find an open source .NET ATOM consumption library,
or one that does RSS and ATOM and I'll just replace the code I use, feel free to comment
and let me know.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,5ef207f0-588c-417d-80ab-fccd43dcb615.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=b039a62d-38cf-4e98-909a-47b3ba362311</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,b039a62d-38cf-4e98-909a-47b3ba362311.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,b039a62d-38cf-4e98-909a-47b3ba362311.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=b039a62d-38cf-4e98-909a-47b3ba362311</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I'm back from training, and I have seen the light. <a href="http://www.shinydonkey.com/">Jerry </a>asked
the other day, “<a href="http://www.shinydonkey.com/thread.aspx?Thread=267">Has
anyone else used Sharepoint Services yet?</a>” and was looking for some feedback,
and I think I've got the skinny.
</p>
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sharepoint/">SharePoint</a> is not just one
thing, and it's not even the same thing all of the time. Currently SharePoint is 2
things:
</p>
        <ol>
          <li>
Windows SharePoint Services 2.0 (WSS)</li>
          <li>
SharePoint Portal Server 2.0 (SPS)</li>
        </ol>
        <p>
And they are both a bit different than v1.0, which was very different than Team SharePoint
YadaYada or whatever it was called before that. WSS 1.0 stored it's bits in file shares
and in Exchange, and SPS 1.0 used SQL Server. SPS 2.0 still uses SQL server, but now
so does WSS, although WSS can use MSDE instead. Therefore WSS is licensed along side
of Windows 2003, and with a MSDE implantation doesn't cost anything above the server
OS.
</p>
        <p>
What is WSS? It's more than a place to put documents, it's a place to put documents,
event details, lists of stuff, conversations, surveys, etc. as well as a web GUI that
lets you access all of these bits. And it's all integrated into Office 2003. You can
schedule a meeting in Outlook, and create a “workspace” for that meeting
in WSS. This allows you to store documents for review, and revision as well as other
collaboration information all in one place, totally dedicated to your meeting. You
can pull in users from ActiveDirectory and give each their own “MySite”
for storing and sharing documents, thoughts, conversations, etc. You can customize
the site with your own templates, or using an SDK make custom widgety things that
WSS calls “Web Parts”. In a nutshell it is “Intranet in a box”
and mostly free. Add on a SQL license and you can use free text searching.
</p>
        <p>
But then, you may ask, what the heck is SharePoint Portal? SPS allows you to much
easier create WSS sites, much easier integrate with AD, search across all of these
sites, and aggregate data from across sites into sites setup for aggregation purposes.
It rounds out the solution making it the only Intranet that many companies might need.
In addition you can use other MS servers like Project Server that integrate right
into WSS and create a site for each project on the server.
</p>
        <p>
Or, you can boot up VisualStudio.NET and use the WSS services without using their
GUI, or use part of their GUI and create your own Web Parts, and get 1/2 of your solution
done up front (if your solution involves collaboration and communication).
</p>
      </body>
      <title>SharePoint?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,b039a62d-38cf-4e98-909a-47b3ba362311.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/04/30/SharePoint.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:41:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
I'm back from training, and I have seen the light. &lt;a href="http://www.shinydonkey.com/"&gt;Jerry &lt;/a&gt;asked
the other day, &amp;#8220;&lt;a href="http://www.shinydonkey.com/thread.aspx?Thread=267"&gt;Has
anyone else used Sharepoint Services yet?&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#8221; and was looking for some feedback,
and I think I've got the skinny.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sharepoint/"&gt;SharePoint&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;is not just one
thing, and it's not even the same thing all of the time. Currently SharePoint is 2
things:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Windows SharePoint Services 2.0 (WSS)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
SharePoint Portal Server 2.0 (SPS)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
And they are both a bit different than v1.0, which was very different than Team SharePoint
YadaYada or whatever it was called before that. WSS 1.0 stored it's bits in file shares
and in Exchange, and SPS 1.0 used SQL Server. SPS 2.0 still uses SQL server, but now
so does WSS, although WSS can use MSDE instead. Therefore WSS is licensed along side
of Windows 2003, and with a MSDE implantation doesn't cost anything above the server
OS.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
What is WSS? It's more than a place to put documents, it's a place to put documents,
event details, lists of stuff, conversations, surveys, etc. as well as a web GUI that
lets you access all of these bits. And it's all integrated into Office 2003. You can
schedule a meeting in Outlook, and create a &amp;#8220;workspace&amp;#8221; for that meeting
in WSS. This allows you to store documents for review, and revision as well as other
collaboration information all in one place, totally dedicated to your meeting. You
can pull in users from ActiveDirectory and give each their own &amp;#8220;MySite&amp;#8221;
for storing and sharing documents, thoughts, conversations, etc. You can customize
the site with your own templates, or using an SDK make custom widgety things that
WSS calls &amp;#8220;Web Parts&amp;#8221;. In a nutshell it is &amp;#8220;Intranet in a box&amp;#8221;
and mostly free. Add on a SQL license and you can use free text searching.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But then, you may ask, what the heck is SharePoint Portal? SPS allows you to much
easier create WSS sites, much easier integrate with AD, search across all of these
sites, and aggregate data from across sites into sites setup for aggregation purposes.
It rounds out the solution making it the only Intranet that many companies might need.
In addition you can use other MS servers like Project Server that integrate right
into WSS and create a site for each project on the server.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Or, you can boot up VisualStudio.NET and use the WSS services without using their
GUI, or use part of their GUI and create your own Web Parts, and get 1/2 of your solution
done up front (if your solution involves collaboration and communication).
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,b039a62d-38cf-4e98-909a-47b3ba362311.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=cf84a4a6-1329-4030-922f-b85b79bb1361</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,cf84a4a6-1329-4030-922f-b85b79bb1361.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,cf84a4a6-1329-4030-922f-b85b79bb1361.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=cf84a4a6-1329-4030-922f-b85b79bb1361</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <blockquote>Expounds the merits of weblogs as a means of sharing knowledge, and describes
the lessons learned from designing and implementing a weblog engine built using Microsoft
.NET technologies.</blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/architecture/journal/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnmaj/html/aj1dasblog.asp">DasBlog:
Notes from Building a Distributed .NET Collaboration System</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
Not much here that you probably don't already know, but it is nice to see a white
paper on freely available software “written” in .NET
</p>
      </body>
      <title>The lowdown on dasBlog</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,cf84a4a6-1329-4030-922f-b85b79bb1361.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/04/13/TheLowdownOnDasBlog.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:37:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Expounds the merits of weblogs as a means of sharing knowledge, and describes
the lessons learned from designing and implementing a weblog engine built using Microsoft
.NET technologies.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/architecture/journal/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnmaj/html/aj1dasblog.asp"&gt;DasBlog:
Notes from Building a Distributed .NET Collaboration System&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Not much here that you probably don't already know, but it is nice to see a white
paper on freely available software &amp;#8220;written&amp;#8221; in .NET
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,cf84a4a6-1329-4030-922f-b85b79bb1361.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=49007cd6-1484-4d01-9257-6dbe42e625c5</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,49007cd6-1484-4d01-9257-6dbe42e625c5.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,49007cd6-1484-4d01-9257-6dbe42e625c5.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=49007cd6-1484-4d01-9257-6dbe42e625c5</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <blockquote>.NET Webservice Studio is a tool to invoke webmethods interactively. The
user can provide a WSDL endpoint. On clicking button Get the tool fetches the WSDL,
generates .NET proxy from the WSDL and displays the list of methods available. The
user can choose any method and provide the required input parameters. On clicking
Invoke the SOAP request is sent to the server and the response is parsed to display
the return value. </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://www.gotdotnet.com/Community/UserSamples/Details.aspx?SampleGuid=65a1d4ea-0f7a-41bd-8494-e916ebc4159c">GotDotNet
User Sample: WebServiceStudio 2.0</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
Sure you can do some testing with the interactive pages that ASP.NET creates for you,
but in my case authentication was done via extra SOAP headers, which cannot be tested
in the auto generated webpages. In addition some of the methods took complex objects
as attributes, which also cannot be tested in the auto generated webpages.
</p>
        <p align="left">
This tool will get the WSDL and write the same wrappers that you would get in a .NET
program, then (through reflection) allow you to specify the parameters passed in and
interactively call each method. Without this tool the Web Service that I worked
on today would have take 2-5 times as long, since I always do in depth testing of
my work. ;-)
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Indispensable Tool</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,49007cd6-1484-4d01-9257-6dbe42e625c5.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/04/10/IndispensableTool.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2004 17:10:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;.NET Webservice Studio is a tool to invoke webmethods interactively. The
user can provide a WSDL endpoint. On clicking button Get the tool fetches the WSDL,
generates .NET proxy from the WSDL and displays the list of methods available. The
user can choose any method and provide the required input parameters. On clicking
Invoke the SOAP request is sent to the server and the response is parsed to display
the return value. &lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://www.gotdotnet.com/Community/UserSamples/Details.aspx?SampleGuid=65a1d4ea-0f7a-41bd-8494-e916ebc4159c"&gt;GotDotNet
User Sample: WebServiceStudio 2.0&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
Sure you can do some testing with the interactive pages that ASP.NET creates for you,
but in my case authentication was done via extra SOAP headers, which cannot be tested
in the auto generated webpages. In addition some of the methods took complex objects
as attributes, which also cannot be tested in the auto generated webpages.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
This tool will get the WSDL and write the same wrappers that you would get in a .NET
program, then (through reflection) allow you to specify the parameters passed in and
interactively call each method.&amp;nbsp;Without this tool the Web Service that I worked
on today would have take 2-5 times as long, since I always do in depth testing of
my work. ;-)
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,49007cd6-1484-4d01-9257-6dbe42e625c5.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=34ce9d33-7d27-4739-806f-511b831e7c5f</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,34ce9d33-7d27-4739-806f-511b831e7c5f.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,34ce9d33-7d27-4739-806f-511b831e7c5f.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=34ce9d33-7d27-4739-806f-511b831e7c5f</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I am back in compliance with <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/billgates/">Bill Gates</a>' <a href="http://raw.wwe.com/superstars.html">One
World Order</a>, by once again achieving <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/learning/mcp/mcp/default.asp">MCP</a> status
by nature of passing test #<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/learning/exams/70-315.asp">70-315</a> (Developing
and Implementing Web Applications with Microsoft Visual C# .NET and Microsoft Visual
Studio .NET).
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Resistance is Futile</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,34ce9d33-7d27-4739-806f-511b831e7c5f.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/04/08/ResistanceIsFutile.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2004 13:53:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
I am back in compliance with &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/billgates/"&gt;Bill Gates&lt;/a&gt;' &lt;a href="http://raw.wwe.com/superstars.html"&gt;One
World Order&lt;/a&gt;, by once again achieving &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/learning/mcp/mcp/default.asp"&gt;MCP&lt;/a&gt; status
by nature of passing test #&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/learning/exams/70-315.asp"&gt;70-315&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(Developing
and Implementing Web Applications with Microsoft Visual C# .NET and Microsoft Visual
Studio .NET).
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,34ce9d33-7d27-4739-806f-511b831e7c5f.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=a6bc026d-6b05-4f0c-800a-fc09e48a4ee4</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,a6bc026d-6b05-4f0c-800a-fc09e48a4ee4.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,a6bc026d-6b05-4f0c-800a-fc09e48a4ee4.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=a6bc026d-6b05-4f0c-800a-fc09e48a4ee4</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <blockquote>Microsoft Corp. Director of Product Management for SQL Server Tom Rizzo
confirmed that Microsoft expects to ship both Yukon—Microsoft's code name for
the next major update of its SQL Server database—and Whidbey—the coming
update of Visual Studio—in the first half of 2005. In the meantime, a third
beta has been added to the current beta schedule of Yukon, with 15 beta customers
from across all major vertical industries signing up to run Yukon Beta 3 live in production
settings before giving the thumbs up for Microsoft to make the product generally available. </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;u=/zd/20040310/tc_zd/121331">Yahoo!
News</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
It's great that Microsoft wants to get it right, but they should stop hyping the future
so much. Most articles in .NET mags these days at least mention what Whidbey will
do, if not only cover what Whidbey will be doing. I'm rather anxious to get it, but
if they keep pushing it back, I'll be sick of it by the time it gets here.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Yukon, Whidbey Releases Slip Yet Again</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,a6bc026d-6b05-4f0c-800a-fc09e48a4ee4.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/03/11/YukonWhidbeyReleasesSlipYetAgain.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:41:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Microsoft Corp. Director of Product Management for SQL Server Tom Rizzo
confirmed that Microsoft expects to ship both Yukon&amp;#8212;Microsoft's code name for
the next major update of its SQL Server database&amp;#8212;and Whidbey&amp;#8212;the coming
update of Visual Studio&amp;#8212;in the first half of 2005. In the meantime, a third
beta has been added to the current beta schedule of Yukon, with 15 beta customers
from across all major vertical industries signing up to run Yukon Beta 3 live in production
settings before giving the thumbs up for Microsoft to make the product generally available. &lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;amp;u=/zd/20040310/tc_zd/121331"&gt;Yahoo!
News&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
It's great that Microsoft wants to get it right, but they should stop hyping the future
so much. Most articles in .NET mags these days at least mention what Whidbey will
do, if not only cover what Whidbey will be doing. I'm rather anxious to get it, but
if they keep pushing it back, I'll be sick of it by the time it gets here.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,a6bc026d-6b05-4f0c-800a-fc09e48a4ee4.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=1ab09b88-0052-4c28-a7d6-8fd28b31935b</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,1ab09b88-0052-4c28-a7d6-8fd28b31935b.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,1ab09b88-0052-4c28-a7d6-8fd28b31935b.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=1ab09b88-0052-4c28-a7d6-8fd28b31935b</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
Here's what my day is going to look like:
</p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
Building secure Web sites is a top priority for developers today. To do this it is
important to understand Web security fundamentals and the nature of threats to applications.
In this track we will explore Web security basics and the methodologies for determining
at-risk aspects of Web applications and how to defend them. We'll walk through the
Microsoft security best-practices reference application for OpenHack throughout the
track and see how you can put those same best practices to work for you. 
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/events/devdays/agenda/web/default.aspx">DevDays
2004: Web Development Track</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
There's been a lot of focus on testing and security these days, I hope we'll get into
a good bit of detail in these sessions.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Building Secure Web Applications with ASP.NET </title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,1ab09b88-0052-4c28-a7d6-8fd28b31935b.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/03/04/BuildingSecureWebApplicationsWithASPNET.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 11:47:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Here's what my day is going to look like:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
Building secure Web sites is a top priority for developers today. To do this it is
important to understand Web security fundamentals and the nature of threats to applications.
In this track we will explore Web security basics and the methodologies for determining
at-risk aspects of Web applications and how to defend them. We'll walk through the
Microsoft security best-practices reference application for OpenHack throughout the
track and see how you can put those same best practices to work for you. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/events/devdays/agenda/web/default.aspx"&gt;DevDays
2004: Web Development Track&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
There's been a lot of focus on testing and security these days, I hope we'll get into
a good bit of detail in these sessions.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,1ab09b88-0052-4c28-a7d6-8fd28b31935b.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=51dca80e-3f95-47b0-a7e7-8c849dae7620</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,51dca80e-3f95-47b0-a7e7-8c849dae7620.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,51dca80e-3f95-47b0-a7e7-8c849dae7620.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=51dca80e-3f95-47b0-a7e7-8c849dae7620</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <blockquote>Visual C# “Whidbey” will include several IDE enhancements
including a first-class code editor with rich editing features, a powerful debugger,
and drag-and-drop visual designers. </blockquote>
        <p align="right">
[ <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdntv/episode.aspx?xml=episodes/en/20040219CSHARPDF/manifest.xml">MSDN
TV</a> ]
</p>
        <p align="left">
I am so freaking jazzed. Generics alone will save hours, the new RAD tools will boost
productivity, the new debug visualizations would have saved me many hours of debugging,
and the refactoring tool is part “bells and whistles“ and part “God
send“. The one new item that seems weak is anonymous methods, it smacks of a
crutch to me.
</p>
        <p align="left">
He doesn't actually discuss partial classes or site templates, but they will be in
Whidbey as well.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>IDE Enhancements for C# Developers </title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,51dca80e-3f95-47b0-a7e7-8c849dae7620.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/02/24/IDEEnhancementsForCDevelopers.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 21:12:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Visual C# &amp;#8220;Whidbey&amp;#8221; will include several IDE enhancements
including a first-class code editor with rich editing features, a powerful debugger,
and drag-and-drop visual designers. &lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p align=right&gt;
[ &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdntv/episode.aspx?xml=episodes/en/20040219CSHARPDF/manifest.xml"&gt;MSDN
TV&lt;/a&gt; ]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
I am so freaking jazzed. Generics alone will save hours, the new RAD tools will boost
productivity, the new debug visualizations would have saved me many hours of debugging,
and the refactoring tool is part &amp;#8220;bells and whistles&amp;#8220; and part &amp;#8220;God
send&amp;#8220;. The one new item that seems weak is anonymous methods, it smacks of a
crutch to me.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=left&gt;
He doesn't actually discuss partial classes or site templates, but they will be in
Whidbey as well.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,51dca80e-3f95-47b0-a7e7-8c849dae7620.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://dak4.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=66b03da5-ad69-4bf8-9a81-c40effced39d</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://dak4.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,66b03da5-ad69-4bf8-9a81-c40effced39d.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <georss:point>39.013865 -77.095377</georss:point>
      <wfw:comment>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,66b03da5-ad69-4bf8-9a81-c40effced39d.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://dak4.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=66b03da5-ad69-4bf8-9a81-c40effced39d</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
My <a href="/dkcPowerToys.aspx">IE Power Toys</a> have a seriously weak installation
process, so I whipped up a little install for the whole set of toys. If figure if
I gots the toolz, I should use them.
</p>
      </body>
      <title>Got Visual Studio?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dak4.com/PermaLink,guid,66b03da5-ad69-4bf8-9a81-c40effced39d.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://dak4.com/2004/01/30/GotVisualStudio.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:51:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
My &lt;a href="/dkcPowerToys.aspx"&gt;IE Power Toys&lt;/a&gt; have a seriously weak installation
process, so I whipped up a little install for the whole set of toys. If figure if
I gots the toolz, I should use them.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://dak4.com/CommentView,guid,66b03da5-ad69-4bf8-9a81-c40effced39d.aspx</comments>
      <category>.net</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>